%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Moca---0.1 % Problem : GRP463-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : moca.sh %s % Computer : n006.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:55:37 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.38s % Output : Proof 0.19s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GRP463-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : moca.sh %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 03:19:26 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable % 0.19/0.38 % SZS output start Proof % 0.19/0.38 The input problem is unsatisfiable because % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable: % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(identity, A), C))) = B % 0.19/0.38 multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(identity, B)) % 0.19/0.38 inverse(A) = divide(identity, A) % 0.19/0.38 identity = divide(A, A) % 0.19/0.38 multiply(inverse(a1), a1) = identity ==> \bottom % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 This holds because % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)): % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 E: % 0.19/0.38 divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(identity, A), C))) = B % 0.19/0.38 f1(identity) = false__ % 0.19/0.38 f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) = true__ % 0.19/0.38 identity = divide(A, A) % 0.19/0.38 inverse(A) = divide(identity, A) % 0.19/0.38 multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(identity, B)) % 0.19/0.38 G: % 0.19/0.38 true__ = false__ % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 This holds because % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS: % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 divide(A, A) -> identity % 0.19/0.38 divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(identity, A), C))) -> B % 0.19/0.38 divide(Y0, divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), divide(inverse(Y0), Y2))) -> Y1 % 0.19/0.38 divide(Y0, divide(divide(inverse(Y1), inverse(Y0)), identity)) -> Y1 % 0.19/0.38 divide(Y0, divide(inverse(Y2), divide(inverse(Y0), Y2))) -> identity % 0.19/0.38 divide(Y0, divide(inverse(inverse(Y0)), identity)) -> identity % 0.19/0.38 divide(Y0, inverse(divide(inverse(Y0), identity))) -> identity % 0.19/0.38 divide(Y0, inverse(divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1 % 0.19/0.38 divide(Y1, identity) -> Y1 % 0.19/0.38 divide(identity, A) -> inverse(A) % 0.19/0.38 divide(inverse(inverse(Y0)), inverse(X1)) -> divide(Y0, inverse(X1)) % 0.19/0.38 f1(identity) -> false__ % 0.19/0.38 f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) -> true__ % 0.19/0.38 inverse(divide(divide(divide(inverse(identity), Y1), Y2), inverse(Y2))) -> Y1 % 0.19/0.38 inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y0), identity), identity)) -> Y0 % 0.19/0.38 inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), inverse(Y2))) -> Y1 % 0.19/0.38 inverse(identity) -> identity % 0.19/0.38 inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1 % 0.19/0.38 multiply(A, B) -> divide(A, divide(identity, B)) % 0.19/0.38 true__ -> false__ % 0.19/0.38 with the LPO induced by % 0.19/0.38 a1 > f1 > multiply > divide > identity > inverse > true__ > false__ % 0.19/0.38 % 0.19/0.38 % SZS output end Proof % 0.19/0.38 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------