↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP464-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gplMSsf5zd true

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:36:30 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.33s 2.40s
% Output   : Refutation 1.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/1.04  % Problem  : GRP464-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.13/1.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gplMSsf5zd true
% 0.13/1.36  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/1.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/1.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/1.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/1.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/1.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/1.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/1.36  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 14:05:39 EDT 2025
% 0.19/1.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/1.38  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.19/1.38  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/1.40  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.19/1.40  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.19/1.41  % Running in FO mode
% 0.51/1.88  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.51/1.88  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.51/1.88  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.30/2.28  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.30/2.28  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.31/2.30  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.31/2.30  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.31/2.30  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.31/2.32  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.31/2.32  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.33/2.40  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 1.33/2.40  % BCE start: 5
% 1.33/2.40  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.33/2.40  % PE start: 5
% 1.33/2.40  logic: eq
% 1.33/2.40  % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.33/2.40  % done 11 iterations in 0.034s
% 1.33/2.40  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.33/2.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.33/2.40  thf(identity_type, type, identity: $i).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(a2_type, type, a2: $i).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(divide_type, type, divide: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(inverse_type, type, inverse: $i > $i).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(prove_these_axioms_2, conjecture,
% 1.33/2.40    (( multiply @ identity @ a2 ) = ( a2 ))).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( multiply @ identity @ a2 ) != ( a2 )),
% 1.33/2.40    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_these_axioms_2])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, (((multiply @ identity @ a2) != (a2))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(multiply, axiom,
% 1.33/2.40    (( multiply @ A @ B ) = ( divide @ A @ ( divide @ identity @ B ) ))).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.33/2.40         ((multiply @ X0 @ X1) = (divide @ X0 @ (divide @ identity @ X1)))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [multiply])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(inverse, axiom, (( inverse @ A ) = ( divide @ identity @ A ))).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i]: ((inverse @ X0) = (divide @ identity @ X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.33/2.40         ((multiply @ X0 @ X1) = (divide @ X0 @ (inverse @ X1)))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i]: ((inverse @ X0) = (divide @ identity @ X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, (((inverse @ (inverse @ a2)) != (a2))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.33/2.40                [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(identity, axiom, (( identity ) = ( divide @ A @ A ))).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((identity) = (divide @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [identity])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i]: ((inverse @ X0) = (divide @ identity @ X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, (((inverse @ identity) = (identity))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((identity) = (divide @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [identity])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(single_axiom, axiom,
% 1.33/2.40    (( divide @
% 1.33/2.40       A @ 
% 1.33/2.40       ( divide @
% 1.33/2.40         ( divide @ ( divide @ ( divide @ A @ A ) @ B ) @ C ) @ 
% 1.33/2.40         ( divide @ ( divide @ identity @ A ) @ C ) ) ) =
% 1.33/2.40     ( B ))).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/2.40         ((divide @ X1 @ 
% 1.33/2.40           (divide @ (divide @ (divide @ (divide @ X1 @ X1) @ X0) @ X2) @ 
% 1.33/2.40            (divide @ (divide @ identity @ X1) @ X2)))
% 1.33/2.40           = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [single_axiom])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((identity) = (divide @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [identity])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i]: ((inverse @ X0) = (divide @ identity @ X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i]: ((inverse @ X0) = (divide @ identity @ X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/2.40         ((divide @ X1 @ 
% 1.33/2.40           (divide @ (divide @ (inverse @ X0) @ X2) @ 
% 1.33/2.40            (divide @ (inverse @ X1) @ X2)))
% 1.33/2.40           = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.33/2.40                [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2, 
% 1.33/2.40                 zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((divide @ X0 @ identity) = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/2.40         ((divide @ X1 @ 
% 1.33/2.40           (divide @ (divide @ (inverse @ X0) @ X2) @ 
% 1.33/2.40            (divide @ (inverse @ X1) @ X2)))
% 1.33/2.40           = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.33/2.40                [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2, 
% 1.33/2.40                 zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl24, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.33/2.40         ((divide @ X1 @ 
% 1.33/2.40           (divide @ (inverse @ X0) @ (divide @ (inverse @ X1) @ identity)))
% 1.33/2.40           = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((divide @ X0 @ identity) = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.33/2.40         ((divide @ X1 @ (divide @ (inverse @ X0) @ (inverse @ X1))) = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl24, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.33/2.40         ((divide @ identity @ (divide @ (inverse @ X0) @ identity)) = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl26])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((divide @ X0 @ identity) = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i]: ((inverse @ X0) = (divide @ identity @ X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 1.33/2.40      (![X0 : $i]: ((inverse @ (inverse @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.33/2.40                [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain, (((a2) != (a2))),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 1.33/2.40  thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain, ($false),
% 1.33/2.40      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl37])).
% 1.33/2.40  
% 1.33/2.40  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.33/2.40  
% 1.33/2.40  
% 1.33/2.40  % Terminating...
% 1.71/2.67  % Runner terminated.
% 1.73/2.69  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------