↑ Up

Matita---1.0.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Matita---1.0
% Problem  : GRP482-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:30:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GRP482-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 06:21:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  8171: Facts:
% 0.13/0.34  8171:  Id :   2, {_}:
% 0.13/0.34            double_divide
% 0.13/0.34              (double_divide (double_divide ?2 (double_divide ?3 identity))
% 0.13/0.34                (double_divide
% 0.13/0.34                  (double_divide ?4
% 0.13/0.34                    (double_divide ?5 (double_divide ?5 identity)))
% 0.13/0.34                  (double_divide ?2 identity))) ?3
% 0.13/0.34            =>=
% 0.13/0.34            ?4
% 0.13/0.34            [5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5
% 0.13/0.34  8171:  Id :   3, {_}:
% 0.13/0.34            multiply ?7 ?8 =<= double_divide (double_divide ?8 ?7) identity
% 0.13/0.34            [8, 7] by multiply ?7 ?8
% 0.13/0.34  8171:  Id :   4, {_}: inverse ?10 =<= double_divide ?10 identity [10] by inverse ?10
% 0.13/0.34  8171:  Id :   5, {_}:
% 0.13/0.34            identity =<= double_divide ?12 (inverse ?12)
% 0.13/0.34            [12] by identity ?12
% 0.13/0.34  8171: Goal:
% 0.13/0.34  8171:  Id :   1, {_}: multiply identity a2 =>= a2 [] by prove_these_axioms_2
% 0.13/0.35  Statistics :
% 0.13/0.35  Max weight : 26
% 0.13/0.35  Found proof, 0.013880s
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  Id :   5, {_}: identity =<= double_divide ?12 (inverse ?12) [12] by identity ?12
% 0.13/0.35  Id :   2, {_}: double_divide (double_divide (double_divide ?2 (double_divide ?3 identity)) (double_divide (double_divide ?4 (double_divide ?5 (double_divide ?5 identity))) (double_divide ?2 identity))) ?3 =>= ?4 [5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5
% 0.13/0.35  Id :   4, {_}: inverse ?10 =<= double_divide ?10 identity [10] by inverse ?10
% 0.13/0.35  Id :   3, {_}: multiply ?7 ?8 =<= double_divide (double_divide ?8 ?7) identity [8, 7] by multiply ?7 ?8
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  23, {_}: multiply ?7 ?8 =<= inverse (double_divide ?8 ?7) [8, 7] by Demod 3 with 4 at 3
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  27, {_}: multiply identity ?101 =>= inverse (inverse ?101) [101] by Super 23 with 4 at 1,3
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  24, {_}: double_divide (double_divide (double_divide ?2 (inverse ?3)) (double_divide (double_divide ?4 (double_divide ?5 (double_divide ?5 identity))) (double_divide ?2 identity))) ?3 =>= ?4 [5, 4, 3, 2] by Demod 2 with 4 at 2,1,1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  25, {_}: double_divide (double_divide (double_divide ?2 (inverse ?3)) (double_divide (double_divide ?4 (double_divide ?5 (inverse ?5))) (double_divide ?2 identity))) ?3 =>= ?4 [5, 4, 3, 2] by Demod 24 with 4 at 2,2,1,2,1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  26, {_}: double_divide (double_divide (double_divide ?2 (inverse ?3)) (double_divide (double_divide ?4 (double_divide ?5 (inverse ?5))) (inverse ?2))) ?3 =>= ?4 [5, 4, 3, 2] by Demod 25 with 4 at 2,2,1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  34, {_}: double_divide (double_divide (double_divide ?2 (inverse ?3)) (double_divide (double_divide ?4 identity) (inverse ?2))) ?3 =>= ?4 [4, 3, 2] by Demod 26 with 5 at 2,1,2,1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  35, {_}: double_divide (double_divide (double_divide ?2 (inverse ?3)) (double_divide (inverse ?4) (inverse ?2))) ?3 =>= ?4 [4, 3, 2] by Demod 34 with 4 at 1,2,1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  36, {_}: double_divide (double_divide (double_divide (inverse ?115) (inverse ?116)) identity) ?116 =>= ?115 [116, 115] by Super 35 with 5 at 2,1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  42, {_}: double_divide (inverse (double_divide (inverse ?115) (inverse ?116))) ?116 =>= ?115 [116, 115] by Demod 36 with 4 at 1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  57, {_}: double_divide (multiply (inverse ?148) (inverse ?149)) ?148 =>= ?149 [149, 148] by Demod 42 with 23 at 1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  38, {_}: multiply (inverse ?121) ?121 =>= inverse identity [121] by Super 23 with 5 at 1,3
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  60, {_}: double_divide (inverse identity) (inverse ?159) =>= ?159 [159] by Super 57 with 38 at 1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  64, {_}: identity =<= inverse identity [] by Super 5 with 60 at 3
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  73, {_}: double_divide identity (inverse ?159) =>= ?159 [159] by Demod 60 with 64 at 1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  43, {_}: double_divide (multiply (inverse ?116) (inverse ?115)) ?116 =>= ?115 [115, 116] by Demod 42 with 23 at 1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  76, {_}: double_divide (multiply (inverse ?183) identity) ?183 =>= identity [183] by Super 43 with 64 at 2,1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  67, {_}: multiply (inverse ?172) (inverse identity) =>= inverse ?172 [172] by Super 23 with 60 at 1,3
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 102, {_}: multiply (inverse ?172) identity =>= inverse ?172 [172] by Demod 67 with 64 at 2,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  77, {_}: double_divide (multiply identity (inverse ?185)) identity =>= ?185 [185] by Super 43 with 64 at 1,1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  96, {_}: inverse (multiply identity (inverse ?185)) =>= ?185 [185] by Demod 77 with 4 at 2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :  97, {_}: inverse (inverse (inverse (inverse ?185))) =>= ?185 [185] by Demod 96 with 27 at 1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 125, {_}: multiply ?234 identity =<= inverse (inverse (inverse (inverse ?234))) [234] by Super 102 with 97 at 1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 133, {_}: multiply ?234 identity =>= ?234 [234] by Demod 125 with 97 at 3
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 257, {_}: double_divide (inverse ?183) ?183 =>= identity [183] by Demod 76 with 133 at 1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 258, {_}: multiply ?349 (inverse ?349) =>= inverse identity [349] by Super 23 with 257 at 1,3
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 277, {_}: multiply ?349 (inverse ?349) =>= identity [349] by Demod 258 with 64 at 3
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 284, {_}: double_divide identity ?371 =>= inverse ?371 [371] by Super 43 with 277 at 1,2
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 307, {_}: inverse (inverse ?159) =>= ?159 [159] by Demod 73 with 284 at 2
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 309, {_}: multiply identity ?101 =>= ?101 [101] by Demod 27 with 307 at 3
% 0.13/0.35  Id : 329, {_}: a2 === a2 [] by Demod 1 with 309 at 2
% 0.13/0.35  Id :   1, {_}: multiply identity a2 =>= a2 [] by prove_these_axioms_2
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  8174: solved /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p in 0.016043 using nrkbo
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------