↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP489-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:43:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.58s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  51 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   51 (  50 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  104 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(X2,X3))),X2),identity)) = X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(X2,X3))),X2),identity)) = X3,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    double_divide(X1,multiply(X2,double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(X2,X3))))) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    multiply(identity,double_divide(X1,X2)) = double_divide(multiply(X2,X1),identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    double_divide(X1,multiply(X2,double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),X3)))) = multiply(X4,double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X2,identity),double_divide(X4,X3)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(multiply(double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(identity,X2)),identity),identity)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,multiply(X1,double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X2,identity),X3))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    double_divide(X1,multiply(double_divide(X2,X3),double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),multiply(X3,X2))))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),double_divide(multiply(double_divide(multiply(X2,X1),double_divide(identity,X3)),identity),identity)) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = double_divide(multiply(double_divide(multiply(identity,X2),X3),identity),identity),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_9]),c_0_4]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    multiply(X1,double_divide(identity,double_divide(multiply(X2,X3),double_divide(X1,multiply(X2,X3))))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_7]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(X1,double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(X2,identity),double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,X3))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,multiply(X2,double_divide(identity,X3))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(X1,double_divide(identity,double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,X2)))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,identity))) = double_divide(X3,double_divide(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    double_divide(X1,multiply(multiply(double_divide(multiply(identity,X1),double_divide(identity,X2)),identity),double_divide(identity,X2))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,X1)) = double_divide(X3,double_divide(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,multiply(X1,double_divide(identity,multiply(identity,X2))))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    double_divide(X1,multiply(multiply(double_divide(multiply(identity,X1),X2),identity),X2)) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiply(double_divide(X1,X2),X2) = multiply(double_divide(X1,X3),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_19]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiply(X1,double_divide(identity,multiply(multiply(X1,double_divide(identity,multiply(identity,X2))),X2))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_20]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    double_divide(X1,multiply(multiply(double_divide(multiply(identity,X1),X2),X2),identity)) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    double_divide(multiply(double_divide(X1,double_divide(identity,X1)),identity),identity) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiply(double_divide(multiply(identity,identity),double_divide(identity,multiply(identity,identity))),identity) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    double_divide(identity,identity) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(multiply(double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),X2),identity),identity)) = multiply(X3,double_divide(identity,double_divide(double_divide(identity,identity),double_divide(X3,X2)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(identity,X1)) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_27]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    multiply(identity,identity) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_27]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    multiply(double_divide(multiply(double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(identity,X2)),identity),identity),X1) = double_divide(X2,identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_8]),c_0_4]),c_0_30]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    double_divide(identity,X1) = double_divide(X1,identity),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_27]),c_0_32]),c_0_4]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    multiply(double_divide(identity,X1),X1) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_29]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(X2,X3),X1)) = double_divide(identity,multiply(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(identity,double_divide(X1,double_divide(multiply(X2,identity),identity)))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X1,identity)) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_33]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    double_divide(identity,double_divide(identity,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = double_divide(X4,double_divide(X2,multiply(X4,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    double_divide(identity,double_divide(X1,X2)) = multiply(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_32]),c_0_27]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    multiply(double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),X3),X3) = multiply(multiply(X2,X1),identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,X1)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_38]),c_0_32]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = multiply(X3,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    multiply(double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),X3),X3) = multiply(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),multiply(X3,X1)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    c_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP489-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:14:21 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/0.50  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.58/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % new_bool_1 with pid 3319347 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.50  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.58/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.58/0.50  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/0.50  % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.50  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3319354 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.50  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.58/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.58/0.50  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/0.50  % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.50  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.58/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.50  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.58/0.50  
% 0.58/0.50  % Proof found!
% 0.58/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.58/0.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.58/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.58/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.58/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.58/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 625
% 0.58/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 237
% 0.58/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 231
% 0.58/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 157
% 0.58/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.58/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 119
% 0.58/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 9949
% 0.58/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7273
% 0.58/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 9949
% 0.58/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 15407
% 0.58/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 12828
% 0.58/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.58/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.58/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.58/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.58/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.58/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.58/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.58/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.58/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.58/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.58/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.58/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.58/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 37
% 0.58/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 35
% 0.58/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.58/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.58/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3614
% 0.58/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3614
% 0.58/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 120
% 0.58/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 107
% 0.58/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 224
% 0.58/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 540
% 0.58/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 173
% 0.58/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.58/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 145427
% 0.58/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 6
% 0.58/0.51  
% 0.58/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.51  % User time                : 0.062 s
% 0.58/0.51  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.58/0.51  % Total time               : 0.070 s
% 0.58/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.58/0.51  
% 0.58/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.51  % User time                : 0.062 s
% 0.58/0.51  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.58/0.51  % Total time               : 0.076 s
% 0.58/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.58/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------