↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GRP516-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:30:16 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 10.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn   3   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(single_axiom,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : multiply(VAR_0,multiply(multiply(VAR_1,VAR_2),inverse(multiply(VAR_0,VAR_2)))) = VAR_1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,C),inverse(multiply(A,C)))) = B,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[single_axiom]) ).

fof(prove_these_axioms_4,axiom,
    multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_4) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_4]) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    multiply(b,a) != multiply(a,b),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_2]) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,C),inverse(multiply(D,C))))))) = D,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_1]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,multiply(multiply(C,D),inverse(multiply(A,D)))),inverse(C))) = B,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_1]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(A,multiply(C,inverse(multiply(D,multiply(multiply(C,E),inverse(multiply(B,E)))))))))) = D,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_1]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(B))) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(A,multiply(C,inverse(C)))))) = B,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(A))) = B,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    multiply(multiply(A,B),multiply(C,inverse(multiply(C,B)))) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(multiply(B,C),inverse(B))) = multiply(A,C),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    multiply(multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(B,C)))),multiply(multiply(D,C),inverse(D))) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    multiply(multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(B,C)))),C) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    multiply(A,B) = multiply(B,multiply(C,inverse(multiply(C,inverse(A))))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(B,inverse(C))))) = multiply(C,A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_37]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    multiply(A,B) = multiply(A,multiply(C,inverse(multiply(C,inverse(B))))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    multiply(A,multiply(B,inverse(multiply(B,inverse(C))))) = multiply(A,C),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_38]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    multiply(A,B) = multiply(B,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP516-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/10.39  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/10.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/10.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/10.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/10.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/10.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/10.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/10.39  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 14:58:13 UTC 2026
% 0.09/10.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/10.39  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/10.39  % Process 513619 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.09/10.39  % Fri Sep 25 14:58:13 2026
% 0.09/10.39  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/10.39  
% 0.09/10.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/10.41  
% 0.14/10.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/10.41  
% 0.14/10.41  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/10.41  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.14/10.41  % Level of proof is 8.
% 0.14/10.41  % Maximum clause weight is 97.000.
% 0.14/10.41  % Given clauses 11.
% 0.14/10.41  
% 0.14/10.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------