%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : GRP524-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:26:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.26s 1.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 26 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 25 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).
cnf(inverse,axiom,
inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(X3,divide(X1,X2)))) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_4,negated_conjecture,
multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_4) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
inverse ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(X3,divide(X1,X2)))) = X3,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
divide(X1,inverse(X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
inverse(divide(X1,multiply(X2,X1))) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = multiply(divide(X2,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1))) = divide(X2,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
divide(X1,X1) = divide(X2,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
divide(X1,X1) = multiply(inverse(X2),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
inverse(divide(X1,divide(X2,X2))) = inverse(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,divide(X2,X2)))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
inverse(multiply(X1,divide(X2,X2))) = inverse(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_5]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
divide(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_13]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
multiply(X1,divide(X2,X1)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_17]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
divide(X1,divide(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
multiply(X1,inverse(X2)) = divide(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
multiply(divide(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
divide(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
prove_these_axioms_4 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GRP524-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 4 18:42:25 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72 % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------