↑ Up

Moca---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : GRP528-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:56:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.36s 3.43s
% Output   : Proof 3.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GRP528-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 06:09:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.36/3.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.36/3.43  % SZS output start Proof
% 3.36/3.43  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 3.36/3.43  
% 3.36/3.43  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 3.36/3.43  
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(A, divide(divide(A, B), divide(C, B))) = C
% 3.36/3.43  	multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B))
% 3.36/3.43  	inverse(A) = divide(divide(B, B), A)
% 3.36/3.43  	multiply(a, b) = multiply(b, a) ==> \bottom
% 3.36/3.43  
% 3.36/3.43  This holds because
% 3.36/3.43  
% 3.36/3.43  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 3.36/3.43  
% 3.36/3.43  E:
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(A, divide(divide(A, B), divide(C, B))) = C
% 3.36/3.43  	f1(multiply(a, b)) = true__
% 3.36/3.43  	f1(multiply(b, a)) = false__
% 3.36/3.43  	inverse(A) = divide(divide(B, B), A)
% 3.36/3.43  	multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B))
% 3.36/3.43  G:
% 3.36/3.43  	true__ = false__
% 3.36/3.43  
% 3.36/3.43  This holds because
% 3.36/3.43  
% 3.36/3.43  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 3.36/3.43  
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(X1, Y0) = divide(g1, divide(Y0, X1))
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(X1, divide(Y1, divide(g1, X1))) = divide(g1, Y1)
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(X1, divide(g1, Y1)) = divide(Y1, divide(g1, X1))
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(divide(g1, X1), divide(g1, Y0)) = divide(Y0, X1)
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(X1, X1) -> g1
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(Y0, divide(X1, divide(Y2, divide(Y0, X1)))) -> Y2
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(Y0, divide(Y0, Y1)) -> Y1
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(Y0, divide(g1, divide(Y1, Y0))) -> Y1
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(Y0, g1) -> Y0
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(divide(X0, X1), divide(g1, divide(X1, X0))) -> g1
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(divide(X1, X0), X1) -> divide(g1, X0)
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(divide(Y0, X1), divide(X2, X1)) -> divide(Y0, X2)
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(divide(Y0, divide(X2, X1)), X1) -> divide(Y0, X2)
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(divide(g1, X1), Y0) -> divide(g1, divide(X1, divide(g1, Y0)))
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(divide(g1, Y1), divide(g1, divide(Y1, X1))) -> divide(g1, X1)
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(divide(g1, divide(Y0, Y1)), divide(g1, Y0)) -> Y1
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, X1), Y1)), X1) -> Y1
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(false__, multiply(divide(Y0, X1), false__)) -> divide(X1, Y0)
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, X1), divide(g1, Y0))) -> divide(X1, Y0)
% 3.36/3.43  	divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, Y0), X1)) -> divide(Y0, divide(g1, X1))
% 3.36/3.43  	f1(divide(a, divide(g1, b))) -> true__
% 3.36/3.43  	f1(divide(b, divide(g1, a))) -> false__
% 3.36/3.43  	f1(divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, b), a))) -> true__
% 3.36/3.43  	inverse(Y1) -> divide(g1, Y1)
% 3.36/3.43  	inverse(divide(X1, Y0)) -> divide(divide(g1, X1), divide(g1, Y0))
% 3.36/3.43  	inverse(divide(inverse(inverse(divide(X1, Y1))), X1)) -> Y1
% 3.36/3.43  	multiply(Y0, Y2) -> divide(Y0, divide(g1, Y2))
% 3.36/3.43  	true__ -> false__
% 3.36/3.43  with the LPO induced by
% 3.36/3.43  	a > b > f1 > multiply > inverse > divide > g1 > true__ > false__
% 3.36/3.43  
% 3.36/3.43  % SZS output end Proof
% 3.36/3.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------