↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GRP531-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:39:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  25 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (  24 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    divide(divide(X,divide(Y,Z)),divide(X,Y)) = Z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X,Y) = divide(X,divide(divide(Z,Z),Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

cnf(inverse,axiom,
    inverse(X) = divide(divide(Y,Y),X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    multiply(X,Y) = divide(X,inverse(Y)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[multiply,inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3,5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(8,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(X,Y),X)) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[inverse,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(9,plain,
    divide(X,divide(divide(Y,divide(Z,X)),Y)) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X,Y)),inverse(X)) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,inverse,theory(equality)]),inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    inverse(X) = divide(divide(Y,X),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[14,8,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    divide(X,inverse(divide(Y,X))) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[9,17,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    divide(X,divide(Y,Y)) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[inverse,18,theory(equality)]),14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    divide(divide(X,Y),divide(X,Z)) = inverse(divide(Y,Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,18,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),inverse(Y)) = inverse(divide(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[18,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    divide(X,inverse(Y)) = inverse(divide(inverse(X),Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[25,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(29,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(inverse(a3),b3),c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(b3),c3)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[6,14,25,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),Y) = inverse(divide(X,inverse(Y))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[25,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    inverse(divide(X,Y)) = divide(Y,X),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[20,21,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),Y) = divide(inverse(Y),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[30,32,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    divide(divide(X,Y),divide(X,Z)) = divide(Z,Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[21,32,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    divide(c3,divide(inverse(a3),b3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(b3),c3)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[29,32,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    X = divide(Y,divide(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[32,17,theory(equality)]),14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(46,plain,
    divide(X,divide(Y,Z)) = divide(Z,divide(Y,X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[36,39,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[38,34,46,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GRP531-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 09:45:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  "."
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T09:45:09
% 0.20/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T09:45:09
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  #||
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  ||#
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.52  ;       391 formulas have been input or derived (from 27 formulas).
% 0.20/0.52  ;        47 (12%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.20/0.52  ;           26 (55%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.52  ;           21 (45%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.52  ; 
% 0.20/0.52  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.001   2%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (4 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.007  13%   Process new row              (360 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.002   4%   Resolution                   (52 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.007  13%   Paramodulation               (26 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.007  13%   Forward simplification       (314 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.003   6%   Backward simplification      (47 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.002   4%   Ordering                     (722 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.001   2%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.023  43%   Other
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.053        Total
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.056        Real time
% 0.20/0.52  ; 
% 0.20/0.52  ; Term-hash-array has 136 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.52  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (0 at peak, 0 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Path-index has 59 entries (68 at peak, 164 added, 105 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ; Path-index has 201 nodes (238 at peak, 340 added, 139 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ; Trie-index has 59 entries (68 at peak, 164 added, 105 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ; Trie-index has 187 nodes (229 at peak, 509 added, 322 deleted).
% 0.20/0.53  ; Retrieved 664 generalization terms in 1,482 calls.
% 0.20/0.53  ; Retrieved 162 instance terms in 54 calls.
% 0.20/0.53  ; Retrieved 683 unifiable terms in 172 calls.
% 0.20/0.53  ; 
% 0.20/0.53  ; The agenda of rows to process has 16 entries:
% 0.20/0.53  ;     2 with value 19              8 with value 21               2 with value 22
% 0.20/0.53  ;     4 with value 20
% 0.20/0.53  ; The agenda of rows to give has 8 entries:
% 0.20/0.53  ;     2 with value (4 17)          4 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 21)
% 0.20/0.53  Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.53    0.056 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.53    0.046284 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.53    0.010113 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.53    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.53    0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.53    4,192,760 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.53  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.53  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T09:45:09
% 0.20/0.53  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.53  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------