↑ Up

Moca---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : GRP532-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:56:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.14s 2.27s
% Output   : Proof 2.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : GRP532-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 23:49:57 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.14/2.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.14/2.27  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.14/2.27  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 2.14/2.27  
% 2.14/2.27  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 2.14/2.27  
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(A, divide(B, C)), divide(A, B)) = C
% 2.14/2.27  	multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B))
% 2.14/2.27  	inverse(A) = divide(divide(B, B), A)
% 2.14/2.27  	multiply(a, b) = multiply(b, a) ==> \bottom
% 2.14/2.27  
% 2.14/2.27  This holds because
% 2.14/2.27  
% 2.14/2.27  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 2.14/2.27  
% 2.14/2.27  E:
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(A, divide(B, C)), divide(A, B)) = C
% 2.14/2.27  	f1(multiply(a, b)) = true__
% 2.14/2.27  	f1(multiply(b, a)) = false__
% 2.14/2.27  	inverse(A) = divide(divide(B, B), A)
% 2.14/2.27  	multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B))
% 2.14/2.27  G:
% 2.14/2.27  	true__ = false__
% 2.14/2.27  
% 2.14/2.27  This holds because
% 2.14/2.27  
% 2.14/2.27  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 2.14/2.27  
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(X1, Y0) = divide(g1, divide(Y0, X1))
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(X1, divide(Y1, divide(g1, X1))) = divide(g1, Y1)
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(X1, divide(g1, Y1)) = divide(Y1, divide(g1, X1))
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(Y0, X1), divide(Y0, Y1)) = divide(Y1, X1)
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(X2, divide(divide(Y1, divide(Y2, X2)), Y1)) -> Y2
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(Y0, Y0) -> g1
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(Y0, divide(g1, divide(Y1, Y0))) -> Y1
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(Y0, g1) -> Y0
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(Y1, divide(Y1, Y2)) -> Y2
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(A, divide(B, C)), divide(A, B)) -> C
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(X0, X1), X0) -> divide(g1, X1)
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(Y0, inverse(Y2)), divide(Y0, divide(X0, X0))) -> Y2
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(Y1, X1), divide(g1, X1)) -> Y1
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(g1, X1), divide(Y1, X1)) -> divide(g1, Y1)
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(g1, X1), divide(g1, Y0)) -> divide(g1, divide(X1, Y0))
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, Y0), Y1)), Y0) -> Y1
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(g1, divide(X1, divide(Y0, divide(divide(Y0, X1), Y2)))) -> Y2
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(g1, divide(X1, divide(Y0, divide(g1, X1)))) -> Y0
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(g1, divide(X1, divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, X1), Y1)))) -> Y1
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(g1, divide(X2, divide(X0, divide(X1, X2)))) -> divide(X0, X1)
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, X1), Y0)) -> divide(X1, divide(g1, Y0))
% 2.14/2.27  	divide(inverse(divide(divide(divide(X0, X1), X0), Y1)), X1) -> Y1
% 2.14/2.27  	f1(divide(a, divide(g1, b))) -> true__
% 2.14/2.27  	f1(divide(b, divide(g1, a))) -> false__
% 2.14/2.27  	f1(divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, b), a))) -> true__
% 2.14/2.27  	f1(multiply(a, b)) -> true__
% 2.14/2.27  	f1(multiply(b, a)) -> false__
% 2.14/2.27  	inverse(Y1) -> divide(g1, Y1)
% 2.14/2.27  	inverse(divide(X1, inverse(Y0))) -> divide(divide(g1, X1), Y0)
% 2.14/2.27  	inverse(divide(divide(Y1, Y2), Y1)) -> Y2
% 2.14/2.27  	multiply(A, B) -> divide(A, divide(g1, B))
% 2.14/2.27  	true__ -> false__
% 2.14/2.27  with the LPO induced by
% 2.14/2.27  	a > b > multiply > f1 > inverse > divide > g1 > true__ > false__
% 2.14/2.27  
% 2.14/2.27  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.14/2.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------