%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : GRP537-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:44:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 13 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_these_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).
cnf(inverse,axiom,
inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).
cnf(identity,axiom,
identity = divide(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',identity) ).
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
inverse ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
identity = divide(X1,X1),
identity ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
inverse(X1) = divide(identity,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
divide(X1,divide(identity,X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
multiply(divide(identity,a1),a1) != multiply(divide(identity,b1),b1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
multiply(divide(identity,X1),X1) = identity,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GRP537-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:18:47 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1622182 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.13/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.41 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1622187 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.13/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.41 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.41 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.41 % Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.13/0.41 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.13/0.41 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.13/0.41 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.13/0.41 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.13/0.41 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.13/0.41 % Generated clauses : 14
% 0.13/0.41 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.13/0.41 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Paramodulations : 14
% 0.13/0.41 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Total rewrite steps : 9
% 0.13/0.41 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41 % Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.13/0.41 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.13/0.41 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.13/0.41 % ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 0.13/0.41 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.13/0.41 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.13/0.41 % BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.13/0.41 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.41 % Termbank termtop insertions : 178
% 0.13/0.41 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.41 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.41 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.41 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.13/0.41 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.13/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.41 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------