↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP563-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:40:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  38 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (  37 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   80 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    divide(divide(divide(X1,inverse(X2)),X3),divide(X1,X3)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    divide(divide(divide(X1,inverse(X2)),X3),divide(X1,X3)) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    divide(divide(multiply(X1,X2),X3),divide(X1,X3)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    divide(divide(multiply(divide(multiply(X1,X2),X3),X4),divide(X1,X3)),X2) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    multiply(divide(multiply(divide(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),X3),X4),divide(X1,X3)),X2) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    divide(multiply(X1,X2),X1) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_5]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    divide(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),multiply(X1,X3)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiply(divide(X1,X1),X2) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    divide(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(multiply(X2,X1),multiply(X2,X3))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),X2) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),X2) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = divide(X2,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_14]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    divide(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(divide(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_18]),c_0_16]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X2)) = divide(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiply(X1,divide(X2,X1)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X2) = divide(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    inverse(divide(X1,X2)) = divide(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    divide(divide(multiply(X1,X2),X3),X2) = divide(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiply(divide(X1,X2),X3) = divide(X3,divide(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(X3,X1))) = divide(X3,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_27]),c_0_23]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,X2)) = divide(inverse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(X2,X3)) = divide(X3,divide(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(inverse(X2),X3)) = multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(c3,multiply(a3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP563-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.38  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:16:57 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.49  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % new_bool_1 with pid 4154022 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.13/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.49  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.49  % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % SubtermCWHack with pid 4154029 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.49  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.49  % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.49  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.49  % Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.13/0.49  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.13/0.49  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.13/0.49  % Processed clauses                    : 446
% 0.13/0.49  % ...of these trivial                  : 151
% 0.13/0.49  % ...subsumed                          : 191
% 0.13/0.49  % ...remaining for further processing  : 104
% 0.13/0.49  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Backward-rewritten                   : 80
% 0.13/0.49  % Generated clauses                    : 6402
% 0.13/0.49  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4883
% 0.13/0.49  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Paramodulations                      : 6402
% 0.13/0.49  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Total rewrite steps                  : 8416
% 0.13/0.49  % ...of those cached                   : 5394
% 0.13/0.49  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.49  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.49  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.49  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.49  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.49  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.49  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.49  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.49  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.49  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.49  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.49  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.49  % Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.13/0.49  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.13/0.49  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.13/0.49  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.49  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3578
% 0.13/0.49  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3578
% 0.13/0.49  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Current number of archived clauses   : 80
% 0.13/0.49  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.13/0.49  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 59
% 0.13/0.49  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 634
% 0.13/0.49  % BW rewrite match successes           : 158
% 0.13/0.49  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.49  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 61261
% 0.13/0.49  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.49  % User time                : 0.041 s
% 0.13/0.49  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.49  % Total time               : 0.043 s
% 0.13/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.13/0.49  
% 0.13/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.49  % User time                : 0.041 s
% 0.13/0.49  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.49  % Total time               : 0.048 s
% 0.13/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.49  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------