%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP577-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:07:04 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.39s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GRP577-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0. % 0.07/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 06:36:29 EDT 2022 % 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.15/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.15/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S % 0.15/0.38 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP. % 0.15/0.38 # % 0.15/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.15/0.38 # Number of axioms: 5 Number of unprocessed: 5 % 0.15/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.15/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.15/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.22/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.22/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.22/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.22/0.38 # 5 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.22/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.22/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.22/0.38 # Found 5 unit axioms. % 0.22/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.22/0.38 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.22/0.38 # 5 unit axiom clauses % 0.22/0.38 % 0.22/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.22/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.22/0.38 # Creating equality axioms % 0.22/0.38 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.22/0.38 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.22/0.38 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 % 0.22/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X1,identity)=inverse(X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))=multiply(X2,X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),X3),inverse(X2))),inverse(identity))=X3)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (multiply(inverse(a1),a1)!=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.22/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.22/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # Found 5 steps % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X4,identity)=inverse(X4)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (double_divide(X4,identity)=inverse(X4)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (inverse(double_divide(X4,identity))=inverse(inverse(X4))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (inverse(inverse(X4))!=double_divide(inverse(X4),identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (inverse(double_divide(X4,identity))=double_divide(inverse(X4),identity)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_44, ...])). % 0.22/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.22/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 % 0.22/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X1,identity)=inverse(X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))=multiply(X2,X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),X3),inverse(X2))),inverse(identity))=X3)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (multiply(inverse(a1),a1)!=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.22/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.22/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # Found 6 steps % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X7,identity)=inverse(X7)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (double_divide(X7,identity)=inverse(X7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (double_divide(inverse(X7),identity)!=inverse(inverse(X7))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (multiply(double_divide(inverse(X7),identity),double_divide(X7,identity))=multiply(inverse(inverse(X7)),inverse(X7))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (multiply(inverse(inverse(X7)),inverse(X7))!=inverse(double_divide(inverse(X7),inverse(inverse(X7))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (multiply(double_divide(inverse(X7),identity),double_divide(X7,identity))=inverse(double_divide(inverse(X7),inverse(inverse(X7))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_44, ...])). % 0.22/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.22/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 % 0.22/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X1,identity)=inverse(X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))=multiply(X2,X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),X3),inverse(X2))),inverse(identity))=X3)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (multiply(inverse(a1),a1)!=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.22/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.22/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # Found 6 steps % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X6,identity)=inverse(X6)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (double_divide(X6,identity)=inverse(X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (double_divide(X1,identity)!=inverse(X1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (multiply(double_divide(X6,identity),double_divide(X1,identity))=multiply(inverse(X6),inverse(X1))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (multiply(inverse(X6),inverse(X1))!=double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),multiply(inverse(X6),inverse(X1))),inverse(X2))),inverse(identity))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (multiply(double_divide(X6,identity),double_divide(X1,identity))=double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),multiply(inverse(X6),inverse(X1))),inverse(X2))),inverse(identity))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_44, ...])). % 0.22/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.22/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 % 0.22/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X1,identity)=inverse(X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))=multiply(X2,X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),X3),inverse(X2))),inverse(identity))=X3)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (multiply(inverse(a1),a1)!=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.22/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.22/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # Found 6 steps % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X11,identity)=inverse(X11)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (double_divide(X11,identity)=inverse(X11)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (double_divide(X1,identity)!=inverse(X1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(X11,identity))=double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X11))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X11))!=double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X11))),inverse(X2))),inverse(identity))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(X11,identity))=double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X11))),inverse(X2))),inverse(identity))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_44, ...])). % 0.22/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.22/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.22/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 % 0.22/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.22/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X1,identity)=inverse(X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))=multiply(X2,X1))). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),X3),inverse(X2))),inverse(identity))=X3)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (multiply(inverse(a1),a1)!=identity)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.22/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.22/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # Found 6 steps % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (double_divide(X6,identity)=inverse(X6)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (double_divide(X6,identity)=inverse(X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (double_divide(inverse(X6),identity)!=inverse(inverse(X6))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (double_divide(double_divide(X6,identity),double_divide(inverse(X6),identity))=double_divide(inverse(X6),inverse(inverse(X6)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (double_divide(inverse(X6),inverse(inverse(X6)))!=identity), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.22/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (double_divide(double_divide(X6,identity),double_divide(inverse(X6),identity))=identity), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_44, ...])). % 0.22/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.22/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.22/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.22/0.39 # Child (2577) has found a proof. % 0.22/0.39 % 0.22/0.39 # Proof search is over... % 0.22/0.39 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------