↑ Up

Moca---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : GRP589-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:56:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.13s 6.28s
% Output   : Proof 6.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : GRP589-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 13:47:10 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.13/6.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.13/6.28  % SZS output start Proof
% 6.13/6.28  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(A, B), inverse(double_divide(A, inverse(C))))), B) = C
% 6.13/6.28  	multiply(A, B) = inverse(double_divide(B, A))
% 6.13/6.28  	multiply(inverse(a1), a1) = multiply(inverse(b1), b1) ==> \bottom
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  This holds because
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  E:
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(A, B), inverse(double_divide(A, inverse(C))))), B) = C
% 6.13/6.28  	f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) = true__
% 6.13/6.28  	f1(multiply(inverse(b1), b1)) = false__
% 6.13/6.28  	multiply(A, B) = inverse(double_divide(B, A))
% 6.13/6.28  G:
% 6.13/6.28  	true__ = false__
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  This holds because
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(X0, inverse(X0)) -> g1
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(X0, inverse(X0)) -> inverse(g1)
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(g1, g1) -> g1
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(X1), inverse(inverse(double_divide(Y1, inverse(X1))))) -> Y1
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(X2), inverse(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0, inverse(Y1)), inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X2))))))) -> Y1
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(inverse(X1))) -> inverse(double_divide(Y0, inverse(X1)))
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X0))))))) -> Y0
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(Y1), inverse(inverse(inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X0)))))) -> Y1
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1, inverse(Y2))), inverse(X1)) -> Y2
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X2, inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0, Y1), inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X2))))), inverse(Y2))))), Y1) -> Y2
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y0, inverse(Y0))), inverse(Y3)) -> Y3
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y0, inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1, inverse(Y0))), inverse(Y3))))), inverse(X1)) -> Y3
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(A, B), inverse(double_divide(A, inverse(C))))), B) -> C
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X0))), Y1), inverse(Y2))), Y1) -> Y2
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y1, inverse(Y2))), Y3), inverse(Y2))), Y3) -> Y1
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0, inverse(Y2)), inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X2))))), Y1), inverse(X2))), Y1) -> Y2
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X0)))), Y1), inverse(Y2))), Y1) -> Y2
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(g1), g1) -> g1
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(g1), g1) -> inverse(g1)
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X0)))), inverse(Y1)) -> Y1
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X0))))), inverse(Y1)) -> Y1
% 6.13/6.28  	double_divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X0)))))), inverse(Y1)) -> Y1
% 6.13/6.28  	f1(inverse(double_divide(a1, inverse(a1)))) -> true__
% 6.13/6.28  	f1(inverse(double_divide(b1, inverse(b1)))) -> false__
% 6.13/6.28  	f1(multiply(inverse(X1), X1)) -> false__
% 6.13/6.28  	f1(multiply(inverse(X1), X1)) -> true__
% 6.13/6.28  	f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) -> true__
% 6.13/6.28  	inverse(double_divide(Y1, inverse(Y1))) -> g1
% 6.13/6.28  	inverse(double_divide(Y1, inverse(double_divide(X0, inverse(X0))))) -> Y1
% 6.13/6.28  	inverse(double_divide(inverse(g1), g1)) -> g1
% 6.13/6.28  	inverse(g1) -> g1
% 6.13/6.28  	inverse(inverse(g1)) -> g1
% 6.13/6.28  	inverse(multiply(inverse(false__), false__)) -> g1
% 6.13/6.28  	multiply(A, B) -> inverse(double_divide(B, A))
% 6.13/6.28  	true__ -> false__
% 6.13/6.28  with the LPO induced by
% 6.13/6.28  	multiply > double_divide > inverse > g1 > a1 > b1 > f1 > true__ > false__
% 6.13/6.28  
% 6.13/6.28  % SZS output end Proof
% 6.13/6.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------