↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GRP594-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:39:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (  31 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   31 (  30 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   85 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),inverse(double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Z,Y)))))) = Z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X,Y) = inverse(double_divide(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))) != a2,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_2,multiply,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),inverse(double_divide(Z,Y))),Z)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(8,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),inverse(double_divide(X,Z)))) = double_divide(double_divide(Z,U),inverse(double_divide(Y,U))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),Z),inverse(double_divide(Y,Z))) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,8,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),inverse(double_divide(Z,Y))) = double_divide(double_divide(X,U),inverse(double_divide(Z,U))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,8,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),inverse(double_divide(X,Z)))),Y)) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[5,8,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),Z),Z),inverse(X))) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(50,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Z,inverse(double_divide(X,U)))),Y))) = double_divide(Z,U),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[15,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(87,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),inverse(double_divide(X,Y)))),Z)) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[17,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(110,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X,inverse(Y)),Z) = double_divide(double_divide(X,U),inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y,Z)),V),V),U))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[16,44,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(112,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X,double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y,Z)),U),U)),inverse(double_divide(X,V)))) = double_divide(double_divide(V,inverse(Y)),Z),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,44,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(122,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,inverse(X))),Y)) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[87,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(129,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),Y),inverse(inverse(double_divide(Z,inverse(Z)))))) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[44,122,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(133,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),Y) = double_divide(double_divide(X,Z),Z),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[16,122,theory(equality)]),122,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(146,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),inverse(X)),Z),Z)) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[44,133,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(151,plain,
    double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Y,Z))) = double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),Z),U),U),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[133,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(152,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Y,inverse(X))))) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[146,151,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(156,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Y,Z))),Z),inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X,U),U)))) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,133,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(172,plain,
    X = inverse(double_divide(X,inverse(inverse(double_divide(Y,inverse(Y)))))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[122,152,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(173,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),Y) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[129,172,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(180,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Y,Z))),Z),inverse(X))) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[156,173,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(182,plain,
    double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Y,Z))) = double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),Z),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[151,173,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(184,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(a2,b2)),inverse(b2))) != a2,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[4,182,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(204,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X,inverse(Y)),Z) = double_divide(double_divide(X,U),inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y,Z)),U))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[110,173,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(205,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X,inverse(Y)),inverse(double_divide(X,Z))) = double_divide(Y,Z),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[50,204,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(211,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X,Y),Z)) = double_divide(double_divide(Z,inverse(X)),Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[112,205,173,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(218,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),inverse(Y))) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[180,173,211,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(219,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[184,218,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GRP594-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 08:01:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T08:01:17
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n027.cluster.edu at 2022-06-13T08:01:17
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  #||
% 0.19/0.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.60  ||#
% 0.42/0.60  
% 0.42/0.60  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.42/0.60  ;       475 formulas have been input or derived (from 15 formulas).
% 0.42/0.60  ;       219 (46%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.42/0.60  ;          104 (47%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.42/0.60  ;          115 (53%) are still being kept.
% 0.42/0.60  ; 
% 0.42/0.60  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Assert                       (3 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.030  25%   Process new row              (416 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Resolution                   (28 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.013  11%   Paramodulation               (14 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.028  24%   Forward simplification       (389 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.011   9%   Backward simplification      (218 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.009   8%   Ordering                     (1,285 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.026  22%   Other
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.119        Total
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.122        Real time
% 0.42/0.60  ; 
% 0.42/0.60  ; Term-hash-array has 1,000 terms in all.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (0 at peak, 0 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Path-index has 572 entries (828 at peak, 1,025 added, 453 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Path-index has 2,197 nodes (2,402 at peak, 2,542 added, 345 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Trie-index has 572 entries (828 at peak, 1,025 added, 453 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Trie-index has 2,924 nodes (4,240 at peak, 4,928 added, 2,004 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Retrieved 663 generalization terms in 3,523 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Retrieved 1,293 instance terms in 242 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Retrieved 1,727 unifiable terms in 128 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; 
% 0.42/0.60  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 26 entries:
% 0.42/0.60  ;    26 with value 0
% 0.42/0.60  ; The agenda of rows to process has 32 entries:
% 0.42/0.60  ;     2 with value 26              1 with value 31               4 with value 35
% 0.42/0.60  ;     2 with value 27              3 with value 32               1 with value 37
% 0.42/0.60  ;     5 with value 28              5 with value 33               1 with value 38
% 0.42/0.60  ;     2 with value 29              1 with value 34               1 with value 39
% 0.42/0.60  ;     4 with value 30
% 0.42/0.60  ; The agenda of rows to give has 109 entries:
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 16)          4 with value (4 26)           6 with value (4 34)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 18)          3 with value (4 27)          14 with value (4 35)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 20)          4 with value (4 28)           8 with value (4 36)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 21)          6 with value (4 29)           6 with value (4 37)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     5 with value (4 22)          5 with value (4 30)           6 with value (4 38)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 23)          4 with value (4 31)           7 with value (4 39)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     3 with value (4 24)         11 with value (4 32)           2 with value (4 40)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     3 with value (4 25)          7 with value (4 33)
% 0.42/0.60  Evaluation took:
% 0.42/0.60    0.122 seconds of real time
% 0.42/0.60    0.114127 seconds of user run time
% 0.42/0.60    0.008564 seconds of system run time
% 0.42/0.60    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.42/0.60    0 page faults and
% 0.42/0.60    9,359,312 bytes consed.
% 0.42/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.60  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T08:01:17
% 0.42/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.60  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------