↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GRP610-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:26:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  29 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   29 (  28 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),X3)),double_divide(X1,X3))) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),X3)),double_divide(X1,X3))) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),double_divide(X2,X3)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X3,X1)),X4)),X2))) = double_divide(X3,X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),X3)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,X3)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),double_divide(X2,double_divide(X2,inverse(double_divide(X3,X1)))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))),inverse(double_divide(X3,X2))) = double_divide(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(inverse(X2),double_divide(X1,X3)))) = inverse(double_divide(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X2,X3)),X1))) = double_divide(X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    inverse(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))) = double_divide(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),X2)) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    prove_these_axioms_2 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))) != a2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))) = double_divide(X2,inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),X1) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    double_divide(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2)),inverse(a2)) != a2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    double_divide(X1,X2) = double_divide(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)),X3) = double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    double_divide(inverse(a2),double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))) != a2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,inverse(X3))) = inverse(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_25]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_24]),c_0_12]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GRP610-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 18:45:58 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------