↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GRP611-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:39:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  29 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   29 (  28 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),Z)),double_divide(X,Z))) = Y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X,Y) = inverse(double_divide(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(c3,inverse(double_divide(b3,a3)))) != inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(c3,b3)),a3)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3,multiply,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X,double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y,X)),double_divide(Y,Z)))) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Z,X)),U)),Y))) = double_divide(Z,U),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(Z,Y))) = double_divide(inverse(double_divide(U,Z)),double_divide(U,X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(8,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(X,Z)),double_divide(Z,double_divide(Y,U)))) = U,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[5,5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Y,Z)))) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,7,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(X,Z)) = double_divide(inverse(double_divide(U,Y)),double_divide(U,Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,7,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y,Z)),double_divide(X,Z))))) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[5,7,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(X,Z)),U)),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Z,V)),U))) = double_divide(Y,V),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,7,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(X),double_divide(Y,double_divide(Y,inverse(double_divide(Z,X)))))) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(69,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Y,Z)),double_divide(Y,Z))))) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,12,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(95,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Y,Z)))),double_divide(X,U)),double_divide(U,V))) = double_divide(Y,inverse(double_divide(Z,V))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(113,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(double_divide(Z,double_divide(Z,inverse(double_divide(U,V)))),Y))) = double_divide(U,double_divide(inverse(V),X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(122,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(inverse(Y),Y)))) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[69,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X),X))),double_divide(Y,double_divide(Y,Z)))) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[34,122,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(133,plain,
    double_divide(X,double_divide(X,Y)) = double_divide(Z,double_divide(Z,Y)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[12,122,theory(equality)]),122,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(146,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X,double_divide(X,double_divide(inverse(Y),inverse(double_divide(Z,Y)))))) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[34,133,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(151,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),Z) = double_divide(U,double_divide(U,double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Y,Z))))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[133,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(152,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X),Y)),X)) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[146,151,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(172,plain,
    X = inverse(double_divide(inverse(inverse(double_divide(inverse(Y),Y))),X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[122,152,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(173,plain,
    double_divide(X,double_divide(X,Y)) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[130,172,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(185,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(Z,U)),Y))) = double_divide(Z,double_divide(inverse(U),X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[113,173,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(186,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(inverse(Z),Y)) = double_divide(X,Z),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[6,185,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(248,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),double_divide(X,Z)),double_divide(Z,U))) = double_divide(Y,U),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[23,186,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(251,plain,
    double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X,Y)),Z) = double_divide(X,inverse(double_divide(Y,Z))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[95,248,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(254,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[4,251,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GRP611-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 02:09:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T02:09:24
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n004.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T02:09:24
% 0.42/0.60  
% 0.42/0.60  
% 0.42/0.60  #||
% 0.42/0.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.61  ||#
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.42/0.61  ;       507 formulas have been input or derived (from 15 formulas).
% 0.42/0.61  ;       254 (50%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.42/0.61  ;          136 (54%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.42/0.61  ;          118 (46%) are still being kept.
% 0.42/0.61  ; 
% 0.42/0.61  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.001   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (3 calls)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.043  31%   Process new row              (435 calls)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.001   1%   Resolution                   (28 calls)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.010   7%   Paramodulation               (14 calls)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.021  15%   Forward simplification       (408 calls)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.024  17%   Backward simplification      (253 calls)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.015  11%   Ordering                     (1,598 calls)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.023  17%   Other
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.138        Total
% 0.42/0.61  ;     0.141        Real time
% 0.42/0.61  ; 
% 0.42/0.61  ; Term-hash-array has 1,312 terms in all.
% 0.42/0.61  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (0 at peak, 0 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.61  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.61  ; Path-index has 636 entries (965 at peak, 1,393 added, 757 deleted).
% 0.42/0.61  ; Path-index has 2,607 nodes (2,839 at peak, 3,267 added, 660 deleted).
% 0.42/0.61  ; Trie-index has 636 entries (965 at peak, 1,393 added, 757 deleted).
% 0.42/0.61  ; Trie-index has 2,828 nodes (4,177 at peak, 5,899 added, 3,071 deleted).
% 0.42/0.61  ; Retrieved 701 generalization terms in 3,860 calls.
% 0.42/0.61  ; Retrieved 1,715 instance terms in 280 calls.
% 0.42/0.61  ; Retrieved 1,938 unifiable terms in 132 calls.
% 0.42/0.61  ; 
% 0.42/0.61  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 38 entries:
% 0.42/0.61  ;    38 with value 0
% 0.42/0.61  ; The agenda of rows to process has 32 entries:
% 0.42/0.61  ;     2 with value 26              1 with value 31               4 with value 35
% 0.42/0.61  ;     2 with value 27              3 with value 32               1 with value 37
% 0.42/0.61  ;     5 with value 28              5 with value 33               1 with value 38
% 0.42/0.61  ;     2 with value 29              1 with value 34               1 with value 39
% 0.42/0.61  ;     4 with value 30
% 0.42/0.61  ; The agenda of rows to give has 111 entries:
% 0.42/0.61  ;     3 with value (4 16)          4 with value (4 26)           8 with value (4 33)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     1 with value (4 18)          5 with value (4 27)           4 with value (4 34)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     1 with value (4 20)          3 with value (4 28)          15 with value (4 35)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     2 with value (4 21)          5 with value (4 29)           9 with value (4 36)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     7 with value (4 22)          3 with value (4 30)           6 with value (4 37)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     1 with value (4 23)          3 with value (4 31)           6 with value (4 38)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     5 with value (4 24)         14 with value (4 32)           5 with value (4 39)
% 0.42/0.61  ;     1 with value (4 25)
% 0.42/0.61  Evaluation took:
% 0.42/0.61    0.141 seconds of real time
% 0.42/0.61    0.129671 seconds of user run time
% 0.42/0.61    0.011362 seconds of system run time
% 0.42/0.61    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.42/0.61    0 page faults and
% 0.42/0.61    10,709,984 bytes consed.
% 0.42/0.61  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.61  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T02:09:24
% 0.42/0.61  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.61  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------