↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GRP616-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:34:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.53s 6.09s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   0 sgn  56   !;   0   ?;  51   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(X1))),X2)),double_divide(X0,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : multiply(X0,X1) = inverse(double_divide(X1,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_4) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(b,a)) != inverse(double_divide(a,b)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f3,f2,f2]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(X1))),X2)),double_divide(X0,X2)) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    inverse(double_divide(a,b)) != inverse(double_divide(b,a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_95,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(X1))),X2)),inverse(X3))),double_divide(X0,X2))),X1) = X3,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_121,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X0),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(inverse(X2)))),X3)),double_divide(X1,X3)))),X0) = X2,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_95]) ).

tcf(c_156,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X0),inverse(X1))),X0) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_121,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_162,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(X0),double_divide(inverse(X1),X1)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_156,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_164,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X0),inverse(X1))),inverse(X2))),X0)),X1) = X2,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_156,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_240,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X0),X0)),inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_162,c_156]) ).

tcf(c_262,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X0),X1)),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X2),X2)),X1)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_240,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_266,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X0),X0)),inverse(X1))),inverse(X2))),X2) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_240,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_274,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X0),inverse(X1))),X1) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_266,c_240]) ).

tcf(c_583,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(inverse(X0),double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),X1)),X2)) = double_divide(inverse(X2),inverse(X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_156,c_262]) ).

tcf(c_627,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(X0),inverse(double_divide(inverse(X1),X0))) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_262,c_583]) ).

tcf(c_708,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(X0),double_divide(inverse(X0),X1)) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_274,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_728,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : inverse(inverse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_274,c_240]) ).

tcf(c_830,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(X0),double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_728,c_162]) ).

tcf(c_885,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(X0,double_divide(X0,X1)) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_728,c_708]) ).

tcf(c_892,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(X0,double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))) = inverse(X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_728,c_830]) ).

tcf(c_1013,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : inverse(double_divide(inverse(X0),X1)) = double_divide(inverse(X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_627,c_885]) ).

tcf(c_1171,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(double_divide(inverse(X0),double_divide(double_divide(X1,X0),inverse(X2))),X1) = X2,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_728,c_1013]) ).

tcf(c_1174,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(inverse(X0)),X1) = double_divide(X1,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_892,c_1171]) ).

tcf(c_1196,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(X0,X1) = double_divide(X1,X0),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1174,c_728]) ).

tcf(c_1202,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(a,b)) != inverse(double_divide(a,b)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_1196]) ).

tcf(c_1204,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_1202]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP616-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/5.38  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/5.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 15:19:25 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/5.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.17/5.42  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.17/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/5.44  
% 0.17/5.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.17/5.44  
% 0.17/5.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.17/5.45  % Proving...
% 2.53/6.09  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 2.53/6.09  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.53/6.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.53/6.09  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.53/6.09  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ Proving...
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % 
% 2.53/6.09  % clauses                               2
% 2.53/6.09  % conjectures                           1
% 2.53/6.09  % EPR                                   0
% 2.53/6.09  % Horn                                  2
% 2.53/6.09  % unary                                 2
% 2.53/6.09  % binary                                0
% 2.53/6.09  % lits                                  2
% 2.53/6.09  % lits eq                               2
% 2.53/6.09  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.53/6.09  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.53/6.09  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.53/6.09  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.53/6.09  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ 
% 2.53/6.09  % Current options:
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ 
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % 
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % ------ Proving...
% 2.53/6.09  % 
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.53/6.09  
% 2.53/6.09  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------