%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : GRP617-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:34:51 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.94s 1.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 21
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 88 ( 46 unt; 2 def)
% Number of atoms : 201 ( 38 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 139 ( 71 ~; 68 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 103 ( 0 sgn 103 !; 0 ?; 79 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0] : product(identity,X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',left_identity) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0] : product(X0,identity,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',right_identity) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] : product(inverse(X0),X0,identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',left_inverse) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] : product(X0,inverse(X0),identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',right_inverse) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( product(X2,X3,X5)
| ~ product(X0,X4,X5)
| ~ product(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',associativity2) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X0] :
( subgroup1_member(inverse(X0))
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',closure_of_inverse1) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( subgroup1_member(X2)
| ~ product(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',closure_of_product1) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0] :
( subgroup2_member(inverse(X0))
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',closure_of_inverse2) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( subgroup2_member(X2)
| ~ product(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ subgroup2_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',closure_of_product2) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(X1,multiply(X0,inverse(X1))))
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',normality1) ).
fof(f14,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subgroup2_member(multiply(X1,multiply(X0,inverse(X1))))
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',normality2) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
! [X0] :
( X0 = identity
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trivial_intersection) ).
fof(f16,plain,
! [X0] :
( identity = X0
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0) ),
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f17,axiom,
subgroup1_member(v),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',v_in_G1) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
subgroup2_member(u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_in_G2) ).
fof(f19,negated_conjecture,
multiply(v,u) != multiply(u,v),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_vu_equals_uv) ).
tcf(c_67,plain,
! [X0: $i] : product(identity,X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_68,plain,
! [X0: $i] : product(X0,identity,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_69,plain,
! [X0: $i] : product(inverse(X0),X0,identity),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_70,plain,
! [X0: $i] : product(X0,inverse(X0),identity),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_74,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
( product(X2,X5,X4)
| ~ product(X1,X5,X3)
| ~ product(X0,X3,X4)
| ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
tcf(c_75,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(inverse(X0))
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tcf(c_76,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(X2)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0)
| ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
tcf(c_77,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(inverse(X0))
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
tcf(c_78,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(X2)
| ~ subgroup2_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0)
| ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
tcf(c_79,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(X1,multiply(X0,inverse(X1))))
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
tcf(c_80,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(multiply(X1,multiply(X0,inverse(X1))))
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
tcf(c_81,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = identity )
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
tcf(c_82,plain,
subgroup1_member(v),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).
tcf(c_83,plain,
subgroup2_member(u),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
multiply(v,u) != multiply(u,v),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).
tcf(c_95,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(X2)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0)
| ( multiply(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).
tcf(c_97,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(X2)
| ~ subgroup2_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0)
| ( multiply(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_78]) ).
tcf(c_99,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).
tcf(c_100,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiply(X0,identity) = X0,
inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).
tcf(c_101,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),X0) = identity,
inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_69]) ).
tcf(c_102,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiply(X0,inverse(X0)) = identity,
inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_70]) ).
tcf(c_108,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
( ( multiply(X2,X5) = X4 )
| ( multiply(X1,X5) != X3 )
| ( multiply(X0,X3) != X4 )
| ( multiply(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).
tcf(c_211,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(multiply(X0,X1))
| ~ subgroup2_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup2_member(X0) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_97]) ).
tcf(c_218,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(X0,X1))
| ~ subgroup1_member(X1)
| ~ subgroup1_member(X0) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_95]) ).
tcf(c_226,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : multiply(multiply(X0,X1),X2) = multiply(X0,multiply(X1,X2)),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_108]) ).
tcf(c_325,definition,
iPr_def_10 = multiply(v,u),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_326,definition,
iPr_def_11 = multiply(u,v),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_327,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_10 != iPr_def_11,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_326,c_325]) ).
tcf(c_645,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiply(v,multiply(u,X0)) = multiply(iPr_def_10,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_325,c_226]) ).
tcf(c_646,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiply(u,multiply(v,X0)) = multiply(iPr_def_11,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_326,c_226]) ).
tcf(c_649,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),multiply(X0,X1)) = multiply(identity,X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_226]) ).
tcf(c_650,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(X0,multiply(inverse(X0),X1)) = multiply(identity,X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_226]) ).
tcf(c_652,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(multiply(X2,multiply(X0,multiply(X1,inverse(X2)))))
| ~ subgroup2_member(multiply(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_226,c_80]) ).
tcf(c_653,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(X2,multiply(X0,multiply(X1,inverse(X2)))))
| ~ subgroup1_member(multiply(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_226,c_79]) ).
tcf(c_717,plain,
( subgroup1_member(inverse(v))
| ~ subgroup1_member(v) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_75]) ).
tcf(c_734,plain,
multiply(iPr_def_10,inverse(u)) = multiply(v,identity),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_645]) ).
tcf(c_793,plain,
multiply(iPr_def_10,inverse(u)) = v,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_734,c_100]) ).
tcf(c_797,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiply(iPr_def_10,multiply(inverse(u),X0)) = multiply(v,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_793,c_226]) ).
tcf(c_864,plain,
multiply(iPr_def_11,inverse(v)) = multiply(u,identity),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_646]) ).
tcf(c_871,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(multiply(iPr_def_11,X0))
| ~ subgroup2_member(u)
| ~ subgroup2_member(multiply(v,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_646,c_211]) ).
tcf(c_880,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(multiply(iPr_def_11,X0))
| ~ subgroup2_member(multiply(v,X0)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_871,c_83]) ).
tcf(c_993,plain,
multiply(iPr_def_11,inverse(v)) = u,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_864,c_100]) ).
tcf(c_1124,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),multiply(X0,X1)) = X1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_649,c_99]) ).
tcf(c_1133,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiply(inverse(v),multiply(iPr_def_10,X0)) = multiply(u,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_645,c_1124]) ).
tcf(c_1139,plain,
multiply(inverse(iPr_def_11),u) = inverse(v),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_993,c_1124]) ).
tcf(c_1393,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(X0,multiply(inverse(X0),X1)) = X1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_650,c_99]) ).
tcf(c_2275,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(multiply(X1,multiply(X0,identity)))
| ~ subgroup2_member(multiply(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_652]) ).
tcf(c_2289,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subgroup2_member(multiply(X1,X0))
| ~ subgroup2_member(multiply(X0,X1)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2275,c_100]) ).
tcf(c_2408,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(X1,multiply(X0,identity)))
| ~ subgroup1_member(multiply(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_653]) ).
tcf(c_2420,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(X1,X0))
| ~ subgroup1_member(multiply(X0,X1)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2408,c_100]) ).
tcf(c_3340,plain,
( subgroup2_member(multiply(v,inverse(iPr_def_10)))
| ~ subgroup2_member(inverse(u)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_797,c_80]) ).
tcf(c_3350,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(X0,multiply(v,inverse(X0))))
| ~ subgroup1_member(multiply(iPr_def_10,inverse(u))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_797,c_653]) ).
tcf(c_3382,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(X0,multiply(v,inverse(X0))))
| ~ subgroup1_member(v) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3350,c_793]) ).
tcf(c_3383,plain,
! [X0: $i] : subgroup1_member(multiply(X0,multiply(v,inverse(X0)))),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3382,c_82]) ).
tcf(c_3451,plain,
( subgroup2_member(multiply(iPr_def_11,inverse(iPr_def_10)))
| ~ subgroup2_member(inverse(u)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3340,c_880]) ).
tcf(c_4316,plain,
( subgroup1_member(multiply(u,inverse(iPr_def_11)))
| ~ subgroup1_member(inverse(v)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1139,c_2420]) ).
tcf(c_5371,plain,
( subgroup2_member(multiply(inverse(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11))
| ~ subgroup2_member(inverse(u)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3451,c_2289]) ).
tcf(c_6289,plain,
subgroup1_member(multiply(u,inverse(iPr_def_11))),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_4316,c_82,c_717,c_4316]) ).
tcf(c_6292,plain,
subgroup1_member(multiply(inverse(iPr_def_11),u)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6289,c_2420]) ).
tcf(c_6295,plain,
subgroup1_member(inverse(v)),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6292,c_1139]) ).
tcf(c_6344,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(u,X0))
| ~ subgroup1_member(inverse(v))
| ~ subgroup1_member(multiply(iPr_def_10,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1133,c_218]) ).
tcf(c_6389,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subgroup1_member(multiply(u,X0))
| ~ subgroup1_member(multiply(iPr_def_10,X0)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6344,c_6295]) ).
tcf(c_6602,plain,
( ( multiply(inverse(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11) = identity )
| ~ subgroup2_member(inverse(u))
| ~ subgroup1_member(multiply(inverse(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5371,c_81]) ).
tcf(c_6818,plain,
subgroup1_member(multiply(u,multiply(v,inverse(iPr_def_10)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3383,c_6389]) ).
tcf(c_6869,plain,
subgroup1_member(multiply(iPr_def_11,inverse(iPr_def_10))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6818,c_646]) ).
tcf(c_6874,plain,
subgroup1_member(multiply(inverse(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6869,c_2420]) ).
tcf(c_7071,plain,
( ( multiply(inverse(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11) = identity )
| ~ subgroup2_member(inverse(u)) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_6602,c_6602,c_6874]) ).
tcf(c_7077,plain,
( ( multiply(inverse(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11) = identity )
| ~ subgroup2_member(u) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_7071]) ).
tcf(c_7078,plain,
multiply(inverse(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11) = identity,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_7077,c_83]) ).
tcf(c_7098,plain,
multiply(iPr_def_10,identity) = iPr_def_11,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7078,c_1393]) ).
tcf(c_7125,plain,
iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_11,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_7098,c_100]) ).
tcf(c_7126,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_7125,c_327]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : GRP617-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.19/0.47 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.47 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 15:19:36 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.25/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.55
% 0.25/0.55 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.25/0.55
% 0.25/0.55 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.25/0.57 % Proving...
% 4.94/1.51 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.94/1.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ iProver source info
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.94/1.51 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.94/1.51 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 6 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Proving...
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Problem Properties
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 %
% 4.94/1.51 % clauses 17
% 4.94/1.51 % conjectures 1
% 4.94/1.51 % EPR 4
% 4.94/1.51 % Horn 17
% 4.94/1.51 % unary 10
% 4.94/1.51 % binary 4
% 4.94/1.51 % lits 27
% 4.94/1.51 % lits eq 9
% 4.94/1.51 % fd_pure 0
% 4.94/1.51 % fd_pseudo 0
% 4.94/1.51 % fd_cond 1
% 4.94/1.51 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 4.94/1.51 % AC symbols 0
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------
% 4.94/1.51 % Current options:
% 4.94/1.51 % ------
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 %
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % ------ Proving...
% 4.94/1.51 %
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.94/1.51
% 4.94/1.51
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------