↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GRP642+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:26:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.32s 4.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   68 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  26   ~;  15   |;  23   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   2 sgn  17   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = k1_xboole_0
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ r2_hidden(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(t19_latsubgr,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v3_group_1(X1)
        & v4_group_1(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
            & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
         => r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_latsubgr) ).

fof(t20_latsubgr,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v3_group_1(X1)
        & v4_group_1(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
            & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
         => k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2) != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t20_latsubgr) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = k1_xboole_0
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ r2_hidden(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v3_group_1(X1)
        & v4_group_1(X1)
        & l1_group_1(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
            & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
         => r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2)) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t19_latsubgr]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v3_group_1(X1)
          & v4_group_1(X1)
          & l1_group_1(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ( v1_group_1(X2)
              & m1_group_2(X2,X1) )
           => k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2) != k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t20_latsubgr])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1313,X1314,X1315] :
      ( ( X1313 != k1_xboole_0
        | ~ r2_hidden(X1314,X1313) )
      & ( r2_hidden(esk3_1(X1315),X1315)
        | X1315 = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1440,X1441] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X1440)
      | ~ v3_group_1(X1440)
      | ~ v4_group_1(X1440)
      | ~ l1_group_1(X1440)
      | ~ v1_group_1(X1441)
      | ~ m1_group_2(X1441,X1440)
      | r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1440),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1440),X1441)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
    & v3_group_1(esk1_0)
    & v4_group_1(esk1_0)
    & l1_group_1(esk1_0)
    & v1_group_1(esk2_0)
    & m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 != k1_xboole_0
    | ~ r2_hidden(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r2_hidden(k2_group_1(X1),k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(X1),X2))
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X2)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    m1_group_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    k1_funct_1(k1_latsubgr(esk1_0),esk2_0) = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    v1_group_1(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ~ r2_hidden(X1,k1_xboole_0),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GRP642+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 18:53:31 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 5.32/4.83  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 5.32/4.83  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 5.32/4.83  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 5.32/4.83  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.32/4.84  % Total time : 4.196s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------