↑ Up

G4Plus---1.5.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : G4Plus---1.5.2
% Problem  : GRP645+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : g4plus.sh /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 12 07:00:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.84s 2.42s
% Output   : Proof 1.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP645+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : g4plus.sh /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Mon May 11 12:02:27 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.84/2.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.84/2.42  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.84/2.42  
% 1.84/2.42  ===============================================================
% 1.84/2.42  TPTP Problem: t24_latsubgr (conjecture with 61 axiom(s))
% 1.84/2.42    Axioms: [abstractness_v1_group_1,antisymmetry_r2_hidden,cc1_funct_2,cc1_relset_1,cc5_funct_2,cc6_funct_2,commutativity_k3_xboole_0,commutativity_k9_group_2,d1_latsubgr,dt_g1_group_1,dt_k1_funct_1,dt_k1_group_3,dt_k1_latsubgr,dt_k1_xboole_0,dt_k1_zfmisc_1,dt_k2_zfmisc_1,dt_k3_xboole_0,dt_k8_group_2,dt_k9_group_2,dt_l1_group_1,dt_l1_struct_0,dt_m1_group_2,dt_m1_relset_1,dt_m1_subset_1,dt_m2_relset_1,dt_u1_group_1,dt_u1_struct_0,existence_l1_group_1,existence_l1_struct_0,existence_m1_group_2,existence_m1_relset_1,existence_m1_subset_1,existence_m2_relset_1,fc1_group_3,fc1_struct_0,fc1_subset_1,fc1_xboole_0,fc4_subset_1,free_g1_group_1,idempotence_k3_xboole_0,rc1_funct_2,rc1_subset_1,rc1_xboole_0,rc2_partfun1,rc2_subset_1,rc2_xboole_0,rc3_struct_0,rc5_struct_0,redefinition_k9_group_2,redefinition_m2_relset_1,reflexivity_r1_tarski,t1_subset,t23_latsubgr,t2_boole,t2_subset,t3_subset,t4_subset,t5_subset,t6_boole,t7_boole,t8_boole]
% 1.84/2.42  ===============================================================
% 1.84/2.42  
% 1.84/2.42  Combined formula: 61 axiom(s) => conjecture
% 1.84/2.42  
% 1.84/2.42  % Equality/functions detected -> nanoCoP oracle mode
% 1.84/2.42  nanoCoP : 
% 1.84/2.42  % 2,407,518 inferences, 1.305 CPU in 1.306 seconds (100% CPU, 1844198 Lips)
% 1.84/2.42  
% 1.84/2.42  % nanoCoP proof (equality/functions)
% 1.84/2.42  % nanoCoP proof is given at https://g4-mic.vidal-rosset.net/wasm/tinker via nanocop_proves(Your_Formula).
% 1.84/2.42  
% 1.84/2.42  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------