↑ Up

SRASS---0.1.THM-Sol.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : GRP656+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 07:17:05 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.87s
% Output   : Solution 0.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6654/GRP656+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6654/GRP656+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6654/GRP656+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 6750
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.009 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:ld(X2,mult(X2,X1))=X1,file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', f02)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:mult(rd(X2,X1),X1)=X2,file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', f03)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:rd(mult(X2,X1),X1)=X2,file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', f04)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X3]:![X1]:![X2]:mult(mult(X2,X1),mult(X3,X2))=mult(mult(X2,mult(X1,X3)),X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', f05)).
% fof(6, conjecture,?[X4]:![X5]:(mult(X5,X4)=X5&mult(X4,X5)=X5),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', goals)).
% fof(7, negated_conjecture,~(?[X4]:![X5]:(mult(X5,X4)=X5&mult(X4,X5)=X5)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[6])).
% fof(10, plain,![X3]:![X4]:ld(X4,mult(X4,X3))=X3,inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[2])).
% cnf(11,plain,(ld(X1,mult(X1,X2))=X2),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(12, plain,![X3]:![X4]:mult(rd(X4,X3),X3)=X4,inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3])).
% cnf(13,plain,(mult(rd(X1,X2),X2)=X1),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12])).
% fof(14, plain,![X3]:![X4]:rd(mult(X4,X3),X3)=X4,inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4])).
% cnf(15,plain,(rd(mult(X1,X2),X2)=X1),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[14])).
% fof(16, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:mult(mult(X6,X5),mult(X4,X6))=mult(mult(X6,mult(X5,X4)),X6),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(17,plain,(mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X3,X1))=mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[16])).
% fof(18, negated_conjecture,![X4]:?[X5]:(~(mult(X5,X4)=X5)|~(mult(X4,X5)=X5)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7])).
% fof(19, negated_conjecture,![X6]:?[X7]:(~(mult(X7,X6)=X7)|~(mult(X6,X7)=X7)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(20, negated_conjecture,![X6]:(~(mult(esk1_1(X6),X6)=esk1_1(X6))|~(mult(X6,esk1_1(X6))=esk1_1(X6))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[19])).
% cnf(21,negated_conjecture,(mult(X1,esk1_1(X1))!=esk1_1(X1)|mult(esk1_1(X1),X1)!=esk1_1(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[20])).
% cnf(34,plain,(rd(mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X3,X1)),X1)=mult(X1,mult(X2,X3))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[15,17,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(42,plain,(rd(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X1)=mult(X1,mult(X2,rd(X3,X1)))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[34,13,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(51,plain,(mult(X1,mult(X2,rd(X1,X1)))=mult(X1,X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[15,42,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(61,plain,(ld(X1,mult(X1,X2))=mult(X2,rd(X1,X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[11,51,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(69,plain,(X2=mult(X2,rd(X1,X1))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[61,11,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(76,plain,(ld(X1,X1)=rd(X2,X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[11,69,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(95,plain,(mult(ld(X2,X2),X1)=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[13,76,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(113,plain,(mult(rd(X3,X3),X2)=X2),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[95,76,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(162,negated_conjecture,(mult(esk1_1(rd(X1,X1)),rd(X1,X1))!=esk1_1(rd(X1,X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[21,113,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(174,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[162,69,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(175,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[174,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(176,negated_conjecture,($false),175,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 22
% # ...of these trivial                : 3
% # ...subsumed                        : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 19
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 2
% # Generated clauses                  : 106
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 66
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 106
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 17
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 15
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 0
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 1
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 38
% # ...number of literals in the above : 38
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 4
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 18
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 3
% # Backwards rewriting index:    22 leaves,   1.55+/-0.940 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           14 leaves,   1.21+/-0.410 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           19 leaves,   1.47+/-0.819 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.010 s
% # System time            : 0.002 s
% # Total time             : 0.012 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.17 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.17 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6654/GRP656+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------