↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : GRP683-11 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:21:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.22s 8.54s
% Output   : Refutation 6.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  17 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  154 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 152   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0   ^;  32   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(mult_decl,type,
    mult: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(rd_decl,type,
    rd: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(x3_decl,type,
    x3: $i ).

thf(x4_decl,type,
    x4: $i ).

thf(x5_decl,type,
    x5: $i ).

thf(ld_decl,type,
    ld: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( B @ ld ) @ ( A @ mult ) @ ( A @ ld ) )
      = ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ ( A @ rd ) @ mult ) @ rd ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f07) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( B @ ld ) @ ( A @ mult ) @ ( A @ ld ) )
      = ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ ( A @ rd ) @ mult ) @ rd ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ mult ) @ rd ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f02) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ mult ) @ rd ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ mult ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ld ) @ mult ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ld ) @ ld ) )
      = ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ mult ) @ ( A @ ld ) @ mult ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f05) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ mult ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ld ) @ mult ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ld ) @ ld ) )
      = ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ mult ) @ ( A @ ld ) @ mult ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( x5 @ ( x4 @ ( x4 @ ( x3 @ mult ) @ rd ) @ mult ) )
   != ( x5 @ ( x3 @ mult ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( x5 @ ( x4 @ ( x4 @ ( x3 @ mult ) @ rd ) @ mult ) )
   != ( x5 @ ( x3 @ mult ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ rd ) @ ( D @ ( C @ rd ) @ ( B @ ( A @ mult ) @ mult ) @ rd ) )
      = ( D @ ( D @ ( B @ mult ) @ rd ) @ ( A @ mult ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f06) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ rd ) @ ( D @ ( C @ rd ) @ ( B @ ( A @ mult ) @ mult ) @ rd ) )
      = ( D @ ( D @ ( B @ mult ) @ rd ) @ ( A @ mult ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ mult ) @ ( A @ ld ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f01) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ mult ) @ ( A @ ld ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ rd ) @ mult ) )
      = ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ mult ) @ rd ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f04) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ rd ) @ mult ) )
      = ( B @ ( B @ ( A @ mult ) @ rd ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ ld ) @ ( A @ mult ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ mult ) @ ( A @ ld ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f03) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ ld ) @ ( A @ mult ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ mult ) @ ( A @ ld ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(49,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[24,14,20,9,22,12,18,16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : GRP683-11 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.21/5.48  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.21/5.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/5.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/5.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/5.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/5.49  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/5.49  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.21/5.49  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 15:36:49 UTC 2026
% 0.21/5.49  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/5.49  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.29/6.27  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.84/6.53  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (257ms). 
% 1.84/6.55  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.86/7.15  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.86/7.17  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.95/7.29  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.11/7.34  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.11/7.36  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 3.11/7.37  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.11/7.38  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 6.22/8.54  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 6.22/8.54  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 6.22/8.54  % Time passed: 2843ms (effective reasoning time: 1979ms)
% 6.22/8.54  % Axioms used in derivation (7): f03, f02, f07, f06, f05, f04, f01
% 6.22/8.54  % No. of inferences in proof: 17
% 6.22/8.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2843 ms resp. 1979 ms w/o parsing
% 6.49/8.60  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.49/8.60  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------