↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GRP702+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:27:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (  10   ~;   5   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( mult(op_d,mult(X4,X5)) = mult(mult(op_d,X4),X5)
      & mult(X4,mult(X5,op_d)) = mult(mult(X4,X5),op_d)
      & mult(X4,mult(op_d,X5)) = mult(mult(X4,op_d),X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X2] : op_d = ld(X2,mult(op_c,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f11) ).

fof(f02,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ld(X2,mult(X2,X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f02) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : mult(X2,mult(op_c,X1)) = mult(mult(X2,op_c),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f10) ).

fof(f09,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : mult(X2,mult(X1,op_c)) = mult(mult(X2,X1),op_c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f09) ).

fof(f08,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : mult(op_c,mult(X2,X1)) = mult(mult(op_c,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f08) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( mult(op_d,mult(X4,X5)) = mult(mult(op_d,X4),X5)
        & mult(X4,mult(X5,op_d)) = mult(mult(X4,X5),op_d)
        & mult(X4,mult(op_d,X5)) = mult(mult(X4,op_d),X5) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X51] : op_d = ld(X51,mult(op_c,X51)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X34,X35] : ld(X35,mult(X35,X34)) = X34,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f02]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( mult(op_d,mult(esk1_0,esk2_0)) != mult(mult(op_d,esk1_0),esk2_0)
    | mult(esk1_0,mult(esk2_0,op_d)) != mult(mult(esk1_0,esk2_0),op_d)
    | mult(esk1_0,mult(op_d,esk2_0)) != mult(mult(esk1_0,op_d),esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    op_d = ld(X1,mult(op_c,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X49,X50] : mult(X50,mult(op_c,X49)) = mult(mult(X50,op_c),X49),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( mult(op_d,mult(esk1_0,esk2_0)) != mult(mult(op_d,esk1_0),esk2_0)
    | mult(esk1_0,mult(esk2_0,op_d)) != mult(mult(esk1_0,esk2_0),op_d)
    | mult(esk1_0,mult(op_d,esk2_0)) != mult(mult(esk1_0,op_d),esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    op_d = op_c,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(op_c,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,op_c),X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X47,X48] : mult(X48,mult(X47,op_c)) = mult(mult(X48,X47),op_c),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f09]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( mult(mult(op_c,esk1_0),esk2_0) != mult(op_c,mult(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | mult(mult(esk1_0,esk2_0),op_c) != mult(esk1_0,mult(esk2_0,op_c)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,op_c)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),op_c),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X45,X46] : mult(op_c,mult(X46,X45)) = mult(mult(op_c,X46),X45),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f08]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(op_c,esk1_0),esk2_0) != mult(op_c,mult(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    mult(op_c,mult(X1,X2)) = mult(mult(op_c,X1),X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : GRP702+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 19:03:13 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.71  % Total time : 1.368s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------