↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GRP702-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:44:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.66s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : GRP702-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 18:44:40 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.37  Mon Jun 13 18:44:40 2022
% 0.14/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 17290.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.14/0.37  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [copy,36,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.14/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 28
% 0.14/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 3
% 0.14/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 45
% 0.14/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.14/0.40     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.14/0.40     distinct function count: 3
% 0.14/0.40     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.47/0.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/0.66  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Model 4 [ 1 1 435 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Model 5 [ 2 1 30017 ] (0.00 seconds, 95833 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Model 6 [ 2 1 52 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Model 7 [ 2 0 13282 ] (0.00 seconds, 80692 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Model 8 [ 2 0 12265 ] (0.00 seconds, 24126 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.27 sec ----> 76 [binary,75.1,36.1] {+} $F.
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.47/0.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/0.66  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  1 [] {-} mult(op_d,mult(x0,x1))!=mult(mult(op_d,x0),x1).
% 0.47/0.66  2 [copy,1,flip.1] {+} mult(mult(op_d,x0),x1)!=mult(op_d,mult(x0,x1)).
% 0.47/0.66  3 [] {+} mult(A,ld(A,B))=B.
% 0.47/0.66  11 [] {+} mult(A,unit)=A.
% 0.47/0.66  13 [] {+} mult(unit,A)=A.
% 0.47/0.66  18 [] {-} mult(op_c,mult(A,B))=mult(mult(op_c,A),B).
% 0.47/0.66  20,19 [copy,18,flip.1] {-} mult(mult(op_c,A),B)=mult(op_c,mult(A,B)).
% 0.47/0.66  27 [] {-} op_d=ld(A,mult(op_c,A)).
% 0.47/0.66  28 [copy,27,flip.1] {-} ld(A,mult(op_c,A))=op_d.
% 0.47/0.66  36 [] {+} A=A.
% 0.47/0.66  38,37 [para_into,13.1.1,3.1.1,flip.1] {+} ld(unit,A)=A.
% 0.47/0.66  70,69 [para_into,28.1.1.2,11.1.1,demod,38,flip.1] {-} op_d=op_c.
% 0.47/0.66  75 [back_demod,2,demod,70,20,70] {-} mult(op_c,mult(x0,x1))!=mult(op_c,mult(x0,x1)).
% 0.47/0.66  76 [binary,75.1,36.1] {+} $F.
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.47/0.66  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  ============ end of search ============
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  true clauses given           3      (25.0%)
% 0.47/0.66  false clauses given          9
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.47/0.66     5  0         1
% 0.47/0.66     7  2         0
% 0.47/0.66    11  6         1
% 0.47/0.66    15  5         0
% 0.47/0.66    19  2         0
% 0.47/0.66    23  1         0
% 0.47/0.66  tot:  16        2      (11.1% true)
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Model 8 [ 2 0 12265 ] (0.00 seconds, 24126 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.47/0.66  
% 0.47/0.66  Process 17290 finished Mon Jun 13 18:44:41 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------