↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP710+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:41:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  29 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (  40 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  10   ~;   4   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   7 sgn  24   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f01,axiom,
    ! [X1] : mult(X1,unit) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f01) ).

fof(f03,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X1] : mult(X1,mult(X3,mult(X3,X2))) = mult(mult(mult(X1,X3),X3),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f03) ).

fof(f05,axiom,
    ! [X1] : mult(i(X1),X1) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f05) ).

fof(f02,axiom,
    ! [X1] : mult(unit,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f02) ).

fof(f04,axiom,
    ! [X1] : mult(X1,i(X1)) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f04) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ( ! [X7,X8] :
      ? [X9] : mult(X9,X8) = X7
    & ! [X4,X5] :
      ? [X6] : mult(X4,X6) = X5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X10] : mult(X10,unit) = X10,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f01]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] : mult(X14,mult(X13,mult(X13,X12))) = mult(mult(mult(X14,X13),X13),X12),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f03]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    mult(X1,unit) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X2,X3))) = mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),X2) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X16] : mult(i(X16),X16) = unit,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f05]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X11] : mult(unit,X11) = X11,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f02]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)),X3) = mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X2,X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    mult(i(X1),X1) = unit,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    mult(unit,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X15] : mult(X15,i(X15)) = unit,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f04]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X7,X8] :
        ? [X9] : mult(X9,X8) = X7
      & ! [X4,X5] :
        ? [X6] : mult(X4,X6) = X5 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    mult(i(mult(X1,X1)),mult(X1,mult(X1,X2))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    mult(X1,i(X1)) = unit,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X19,X22] :
      ( mult(X22,esk4_0) != esk3_0
      | mult(esk1_0,X19) != esk2_0 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    mult(i(mult(X1,X1)),X1) = i(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    i(mult(i(X1),i(X1))) = mult(X1,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]),c_0_14]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X1),X2) = mult(X1,mult(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( mult(X2,esk4_0) != esk3_0
    | mult(esk1_0,X1) != esk2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    mult(i(X1),mult(X1,mult(X1,X2))) = mult(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    i(i(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_19]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( mult(esk1_0,X2) != esk2_0
    | mult(X1,mult(esk4_0,esk4_0)) != esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2))) = mult(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( mult(esk1_0,X3) != esk2_0
    | mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X2,mult(esk4_0,esk4_0)))) != esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_29]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk1_0,X1) != esk2_0,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_14]),c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(i(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP710+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:34:40 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 133326 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.15/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.44  % Search class: FUHPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 133331 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.44  % Search class: FUHPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.15/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.15/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.15/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 89
% 0.15/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.15/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 34
% 0.15/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 49
% 0.15/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.15/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 18
% 0.15/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.15/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 529
% 0.15/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 335
% 0.15/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 525
% 0.15/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.15/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 819
% 0.15/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 675
% 0.15/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 22
% 0.15/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.15/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.15/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 234
% 0.15/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 288
% 0.15/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 27
% 0.15/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 219
% 0.15/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 208
% 0.15/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 26
% 0.15/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.15/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 31
% 0.15/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 0.15/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 5954
% 0.15/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 45
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.44  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  % User time                : 0.040 s
% 0.15/0.44  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.44  % Total time               : 0.055 s
% 0.15/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------