↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GRP715-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:35:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.28s 1.78s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  43 unt;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (  42 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  25   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : mult(mult(mult(X0,X1),X2),X1) = mult(X0,mult(mult(X1,X2),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f06) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : mult(X0,mult(X1,X1)) = mult(mult(X0,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f07) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0] : mult(X0,unit) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f08) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : mult(unit,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f09) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    mult(op_a,op_b) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f10) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    unit = mult(op_a,op_b),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    mult(op_b,op_a) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f11) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    unit = mult(op_b,op_a),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(x0,op_a),op_b) != x0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    x0 != mult(mult(x0,op_a),op_b),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : mult(mult(mult(X0,X1),X2),X1) = mult(X0,mult(mult(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : mult(mult(X0,X1),X1) = mult(X0,mult(X1,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : mult(X0,unit) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : mult(unit,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    mult(op_a,op_b) = unit,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    mult(op_b,op_a) = unit,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_72,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(x0,op_a),op_b) != x0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_109,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = mult(x0,op_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_110,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = mult(iPr_def_10,op_b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_111,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = mult(op_b,op_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_112,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = mult(op_a,op_b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_113,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_11 != x0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_109,c_110]) ).

tcf(c_114,plain,
    iPr_def_12 = unit,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_115,plain,
    iPr_def_13 = unit,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_116,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : mult(unit,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69]) ).

tcf(c_117,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : mult(X0,unit) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).

tcf(c_118,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : mult(mult(X0,X1),X1) = mult(X0,mult(X1,X1)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).

tcf(c_119,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : mult(mult(mult(X0,X1),X2),X1) = mult(X0,mult(mult(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

tcf(c_183,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : mult(X0,iPr_def_13) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_184,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : mult(iPr_def_13,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_192,plain,
    iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_200,plain,
    mult(op_a,mult(op_b,op_b)) = mult(iPr_def_13,op_b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_118]) ).

tcf(c_203,plain,
    mult(iPr_def_10,mult(op_b,op_b)) = mult(iPr_def_11,op_b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_118]) ).

tcf(c_250,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : mult(x0,mult(mult(op_a,X0),op_a)) = mult(mult(iPr_def_10,X0),op_a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_119]) ).

tcf(c_309,plain,
    mult(op_a,mult(op_b,op_b)) = op_b,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_184]) ).

tcf(c_2185,plain,
    mult(mult(iPr_def_10,op_b),op_a) = mult(x0,mult(iPr_def_13,op_a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_250]) ).

tcf(c_2187,plain,
    mult(mult(iPr_def_10,mult(op_b,op_b)),op_a) = mult(x0,mult(op_b,op_a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_309,c_250]) ).

tcf(c_2332,plain,
    mult(iPr_def_11,op_a) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2185,c_109,c_110,c_184]) ).

tcf(c_2349,plain,
    mult(mult(iPr_def_11,op_b),op_a) = x0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2187,c_111,c_183,c_192,c_203]) ).

tcf(c_2492,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : mult(iPr_def_11,mult(mult(op_a,X0),op_a)) = mult(mult(iPr_def_10,X0),op_a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2332,c_119]) ).

tcf(c_3576,plain,
    mult(mult(iPr_def_10,mult(op_b,op_b)),op_a) = mult(iPr_def_11,mult(op_b,op_a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_309,c_2492]) ).

tcf(c_3823,plain,
    x0 = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3576,c_111,c_183,c_192,c_203,c_2349]) ).

tcf(c_4154,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3823,c_113]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP715-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.39  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 15:52:03 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.42  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.45  % Proving...
% 1.28/1.78  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 1.28/1.78  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.78  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.28/1.78  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.28/1.78  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ Proving...
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % 
% 1.28/1.78  % clauses                               16
% 1.28/1.78  % conjectures                           1
% 1.28/1.78  % EPR                                   3
% 1.28/1.78  % Horn                                  16
% 1.28/1.78  % unary                                 16
% 1.28/1.78  % binary                                0
% 1.28/1.78  % lits                                  16
% 1.28/1.78  % lits eq                               16
% 1.28/1.78  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.28/1.78  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.28/1.78  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.28/1.78  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.28/1.78  % AC symbols                            1
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ 
% 1.28/1.78  % Current options:
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ 
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % 
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % ------ Proving...
% 1.28/1.78  % 
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.28/1.78  
% 1.28/1.78  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------