↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP715-11 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:41:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  23 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   23 (  22 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(f07,axiom,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f07) ).

cnf(f06,axiom,
    mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X2) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f06) ).

cnf(f11,axiom,
    mult(op_b,op_a) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f11) ).

cnf(f09,axiom,
    mult(unit,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f09) ).

cnf(f10,axiom,
    mult(op_a,op_b) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f10) ).

cnf(f08,axiom,
    mult(X1,unit) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f08) ).

cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(x0,op_b),op_a) != x0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X2),
    f07 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X2) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),
    f06 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),X2) = mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),mult(X2,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    mult(op_b,op_a) = unit,
    f11 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    mult(unit,X1) = X1,
    f09 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    mult(op_a,op_b) = unit,
    f10 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    mult(mult(mult(X1,op_b),op_a),mult(op_b,op_b)) = mult(X1,mult(op_b,op_b)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    mult(op_a,mult(op_b,op_b)) = op_b,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    mult(X1,unit) = X1,
    f08 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,mult(op_b,op_b)),op_a) = mult(X1,op_b),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_10]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,op_a),op_b) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_16]),c_0_14]),c_0_10]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(x0,op_b),op_a) != x0,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,op_a),mult(op_b,op_b)) = mult(X1,op_b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(x0,op_b),op_a) != x0,
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,op_b),op_a) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_19]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP715-11 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:36:44 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.52  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.44/0.52  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % new_bool_3 with pid 2562411 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.44/0.52  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.44/0.52  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.44/0.52  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.52  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2562419 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.44/0.52  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.44/0.52  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.44/0.52  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.52  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.52  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.44/0.52  
% 0.44/0.52  % Proof found!
% 0.44/0.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/0.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.52  % Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.44/0.52  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
% 0.44/0.52  % Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.44/0.52  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.44/0.52  % Processed clauses                    : 53
% 0.44/0.52  % ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.44/0.52  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % ...remaining for further processing  : 49
% 0.44/0.52  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 0.44/0.52  % Generated clauses                    : 501
% 0.44/0.52  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 349
% 0.44/0.52  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Paramodulations                      : 501
% 0.44/0.52  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Total rewrite steps                  : 719
% 0.44/0.52  % ...of those cached                   : 590
% 0.44/0.52  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.44/0.52  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.44/0.52  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.44/0.52  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.44/0.52  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.44/0.52  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.44/0.52  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.44/0.52  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.44/0.52  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.44/0.52  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.44/0.52  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.44/0.52  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.44/0.52  % Current number of processed clauses  : 37
% 0.44/0.52  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 37
% 0.44/0.52  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.44/0.52  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.44/0.52  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 299
% 0.44/0.52  % ...number of literals in the above   : 299
% 0.44/0.52  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.44/0.52  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 47
% 0.44/0.52  % BW rewrite match successes           : 14
% 0.44/0.52  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.44/0.52  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 10554
% 0.44/0.52  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 19
% 0.44/0.52  
% 0.44/0.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.52  % User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.44/0.52  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.44/0.52  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.44/0.52  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.44/0.52  
% 0.44/0.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.52  % User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.44/0.52  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.44/0.52  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.44/0.52  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.44/0.52  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------