↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP731-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:41:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.09s 0.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  51 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   51 (  50 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  104 (  25 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c06,axiom,
    mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c06) ).

cnf(c04,axiom,
    mult(i(X1),X1) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c04) ).

cnf(c02,axiom,
    mult(X1,unit) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c02) ).

cnf(c05,axiom,
    i(mult(X1,X2)) = mult(i(X1),i(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c05) ).

cnf(c10,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),X3) = mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),asoc(X1,X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c10) ).

cnf(c11,axiom,
    mult(X1,X2) = mult(mult(X2,X1),op_k(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c11) ).

cnf(c01,axiom,
    mult(unit,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c01) ).

cnf(c03,axiom,
    mult(X1,i(X1)) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c03) ).

cnf(c21,axiom,
    asoc(asoc(X1,X2,X3),X4,X5) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c21) ).

cnf(c07,axiom,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c07) ).

cnf(c09,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X1)),X3) = mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X1,X3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c09) ).

cnf(c08,axiom,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c08) ).

cnf(goals,negated_conjecture,
    op_k(asoc(a,b,c),d) != unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    c06 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    mult(i(X1),X1) = unit,
    c04 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    mult(X1,unit) = X1,
    c02 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    i(mult(X1,X2)) = mult(i(X1),i(X2)),
    c05 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    i(i(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),X3) = mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),asoc(X1,X2,X3)),
    c10 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    mult(X1,i(mult(X1,X2))) = i(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    mult(X1,X2) = mult(mult(X2,X1),op_k(X1,X2)),
    c11 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    mult(unit,X1) = X1,
    c01 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    mult(X1,i(X1)) = unit,
    c03 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    mult(i(mult(X1,mult(X2,X3))),mult(mult(X1,X2),X3)) = asoc(X1,X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),i(mult(X2,X1))) = i(op_k(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    i(unit) = unit,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    asoc(asoc(X1,X2,X3),X4,X5) = unit,
    c21 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    asoc(X1,X2,i(mult(X2,X1))) = i(op_k(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_19]),c_0_22]),c_0_25]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    c07 ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,mult(X2,X1)),X3) = mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X1,X3))),
    c09 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    i(op_k(X1,asoc(X2,X3,X4))) = unit,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X1,X3))),X3) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    rd(X1,mult(X2,X1)) = i(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    c08 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(i(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    op_k(X1,asoc(X2,X3,X4)) = unit,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_30]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(i(mult(X1,X2)),X1)) = rd(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    i(rd(X1,X2)) = rd(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    i(mult(i(X1),X2)) = mult(X1,i(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    mult(X1,op_k(mult(i(X2),X1),X2)) = mult(mult(i(X2),X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    op_k(X1,i(op_k(X2,X3))) = unit,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),i(X1)) = mult(X1,rd(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    mult(op_k(X1,X2),rd(X3,op_k(X1,X2))) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_15]),c_0_17]),c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    rd(X1,rd(X1,op_k(X2,X3))) = op_k(X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),op_k(X1,X2)) = mult(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),mult(X2,X1)) = op_k(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    op_k(asoc(a,b,c),d) != unit,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    i(op_k(X1,X2)) = op_k(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_45]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    op_k(asoc(a,b,c),d) != unit,
    c_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    op_k(asoc(X1,X2,X3),X4) = unit,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_35]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP731-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:36:09 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.09/0.70  % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.09/0.70  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.09/0.70  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3477117 completed with status 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 2.09/0.70  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.09/0.70  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.09/0.70  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.09/0.70  % Search class: FUUPM-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 2.09/0.70  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 226s (1) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting new_bool_3 with 226s (1) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting new_bool_1 with 226s (1) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3477124 completed with status 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 2.09/0.70  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.09/0.70  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.09/0.70  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.09/0.70  % Search class: FUUPM-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 2.09/0.70  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.09/0.70  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.09/0.70  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 2.09/0.70  
% 2.09/0.70  % Proof found!
% 2.09/0.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.09/0.70  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.09/0.70  % Parsed axioms                        : 23
% 2.09/0.70  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Initial clauses                      : 23
% 2.09/0.70  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 2.09/0.70  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 2.09/0.70  % Processed clauses                    : 541
% 2.09/0.70  % ...of these trivial                  : 247
% 2.09/0.70  % ...subsumed                          : 79
% 2.09/0.70  % ...remaining for further processing  : 215
% 2.09/0.70  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Backward-rewritten                   : 55
% 2.09/0.70  % Generated clauses                    : 18089
% 2.09/0.70  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12761
% 2.09/0.70  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Paramodulations                      : 18089
% 2.09/0.70  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % NegExts                              : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Total rewrite steps                  : 28322
% 2.09/0.70  % ...of those cached                   : 23958
% 2.09/0.70  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.09/0.70  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.09/0.70  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.09/0.70  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.09/0.70  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.09/0.70  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.09/0.70  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.09/0.70  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.09/0.70  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.09/0.70  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.09/0.70  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.09/0.70  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.09/0.70  % Current number of processed clauses  : 160
% 2.09/0.70  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 153
% 2.09/0.70  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 2.09/0.70  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 2.09/0.70  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12059
% 2.09/0.70  % ...number of literals in the above   : 12059
% 2.09/0.70  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Current number of archived clauses   : 58
% 2.09/0.70  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 2.09/0.70  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 428
% 2.09/0.70  % BW rewrite match successes           : 74
% 2.09/0.70  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.09/0.70  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 296005
% 2.09/0.70  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 2.09/0.70  
% 2.09/0.70  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.09/0.70  % User time                : 0.227 s
% 2.09/0.70  % System time              : 0.024 s
% 2.09/0.70  % Total time               : 0.252 s
% 2.09/0.70  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 2.09/0.70  
% 2.09/0.70  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.09/0.70  % User time                : 1.063 s
% 2.09/0.70  % System time              : 0.099 s
% 2.09/0.70  % Total time               : 1.162 s
% 2.09/0.70  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 2.09/0.70  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------