↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP748+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:45:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.59s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  33 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (  54 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (   8   ~;  11   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;  13 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (   0 sgn  50   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ( ! [X13,X14,X15] : mult(mult(X15,X13),mult(X14,X15)) = mult(X15,mult(mult(X13,X14),X15))
    | ! [X10,X11,X12] : mult(mult(X12,X10),mult(X11,X12)) = mult(mult(X12,mult(X10,X11)),X12)
    | ! [X7,X8,X9] : mult(X7,mult(X9,mult(X8,X9))) = mult(mult(mult(X7,X9),X8),X9)
    | ! [X4,X5,X6] : mult(X6,mult(X4,mult(X6,X5))) = mult(mult(mult(X6,X4),X6),X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f07,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1,X2] : mult(mult(mult(X2,X1),X3),X1) = mult(X2,mult(mult(X1,X3),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f07) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X2] : mult(i(X2),X2) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f10) ).

fof(f06,axiom,
    ! [X2] : mult(unit,X2) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f06) ).

fof(f08,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : mult(mult(X2,X1),i(X1)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f08) ).

fof(f09,axiom,
    ! [X2] : mult(X2,i(X2)) = unit,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f09) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( mult(i(X2),mult(X2,X1)) = X1
      | mult(X2,X1) = mult(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f11) ).

fof(f05,axiom,
    ! [X2] : mult(X2,unit) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f05) ).

fof(f02,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ld(X2,mult(X2,X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f02) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X13,X14,X15] : mult(mult(X15,X13),mult(X14,X15)) = mult(X15,mult(mult(X13,X14),X15))
      | ! [X10,X11,X12] : mult(mult(X12,X10),mult(X11,X12)) = mult(mult(X12,mult(X10,X11)),X12)
      | ! [X7,X8,X9] : mult(X7,mult(X9,mult(X8,X9))) = mult(mult(mult(X7,X9),X8),X9)
      | ! [X4,X5,X6] : mult(X6,mult(X4,mult(X6,X5))) = mult(mult(mult(X6,X4),X6),X5) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X26,X27,X28] : mult(mult(mult(X28,X27),X26),X27) = mult(X28,mult(mult(X27,X26),X27)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f07]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X32] : mult(i(X32),X32) = unit,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X25] : mult(unit,X25) = X25,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f06]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X29,X30] : mult(mult(X30,X29),i(X29)) = X30,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f08]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X31] : mult(X31,i(X31)) = unit,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f09]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( mult(mult(esk12_0,esk10_0),mult(esk11_0,esk12_0)) != mult(esk12_0,mult(mult(esk10_0,esk11_0),esk12_0))
    & mult(mult(esk9_0,esk7_0),mult(esk8_0,esk9_0)) != mult(mult(esk9_0,mult(esk7_0,esk8_0)),esk9_0)
    & mult(esk4_0,mult(esk6_0,mult(esk5_0,esk6_0))) != mult(mult(mult(esk4_0,esk6_0),esk5_0),esk6_0)
    & mult(esk3_0,mult(esk1_0,mult(esk3_0,esk2_0))) != mult(mult(mult(esk3_0,esk1_0),esk3_0),esk2_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X33,X34] :
      ( mult(i(X34),mult(X34,X33)) = X33
      | mult(X34,X33) = mult(X33,X34) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X2) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    mult(i(X1),X1) = unit,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    mult(unit,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),i(X2)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    mult(X1,i(X1)) = unit,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X24] : mult(X24,unit) = X24,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f05]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk4_0,mult(esk6_0,mult(esk5_0,esk6_0))) != mult(mult(mult(esk4_0,esk6_0),esk5_0),esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2)) = X2
    | mult(X1,X2) = mult(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    mult(i(X1),mult(mult(X1,X2),X1)) = mult(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    i(i(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X18,X19] : ld(X19,mult(X19,X18)) = X18,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f02]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    mult(X1,unit) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk4_0,mult(mult(esk6_0,esk5_0),esk6_0)) != mult(esk4_0,mult(esk6_0,mult(esk5_0,esk6_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( mult(X2,X1) = mult(X1,X2)
    | mult(mult(X1,X2),X1) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),X2) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_28]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk5_0,esk6_0) = mult(esk6_0,esk5_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ld(i(X1),mult(X2,X1)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(esk6_0,esk5_0),esk6_0) = mult(esk5_0,mult(esk6_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( mult(X1,X2) = mult(X2,X1)
    | ld(i(X1),X2) = mult(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ld(i(esk6_0),mult(esk6_0,esk5_0)) = mult(esk5_0,mult(esk6_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_33]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk4_0,mult(esk5_0,mult(esk6_0,esk6_0))) != mult(esk4_0,mult(esk6_0,mult(esk6_0,esk5_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_35]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    mult(esk5_0,mult(esk6_0,esk6_0)) = mult(esk6_0,mult(esk6_0,esk5_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP748+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:39:00 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.50  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.59/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.59/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2565622 completed with status 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.59/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.59/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.59/0.50  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.59/0.50  % Search class: FGUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.59/0.50  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2565628 completed with status 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Result found by C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.59/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.59/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.59/0.50  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.59/0.50  % Search class: FGUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.59/0.50  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.50  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.59/0.50  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.59/0.50  
% 0.59/0.50  % Proof found!
% 0.59/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.59/0.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.50  % Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.59/0.50  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.59/0.50  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.59/0.50  % Processed clauses                    : 230
% 0.59/0.50  % ...of these trivial                  : 64
% 0.59/0.50  % ...subsumed                          : 39
% 0.59/0.50  % ...remaining for further processing  : 127
% 0.59/0.50  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Backward-rewritten                   : 18
% 0.59/0.50  % Generated clauses                    : 4835
% 0.59/0.50  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3624
% 0.59/0.50  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Paramodulations                      : 4835
% 0.59/0.50  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Total rewrite steps                  : 7034
% 0.59/0.50  % ...of those cached                   : 6513
% 0.59/0.50  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.59/0.50  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.59/0.50  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.59/0.50  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.59/0.50  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.59/0.50  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.59/0.50  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.59/0.50  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.59/0.50  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.59/0.50  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.59/0.50  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.59/0.50  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.59/0.50  % Current number of processed clauses  : 94
% 0.59/0.50  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 68
% 0.59/0.50  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.59/0.50  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.59/0.50  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 23
% 0.59/0.50  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3411
% 0.59/0.50  % ...number of literals in the above   : 5414
% 0.59/0.50  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Current number of archived clauses   : 33
% 0.59/0.50  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 614
% 0.59/0.50  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 332
% 0.59/0.50  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 39
% 0.59/0.50  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 247
% 0.59/0.50  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 87
% 0.59/0.50  % BW rewrite match successes           : 16
% 0.59/0.50  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.59/0.50  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 67524
% 0.59/0.50  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 106
% 0.59/0.50  
% 0.59/0.50  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.50  % User time                : 0.064 s
% 0.59/0.50  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.59/0.50  % Total time               : 0.073 s
% 0.59/0.50  % Maximum resident set size: 3388 pages
% 0.59/0.50  
% 0.59/0.50  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.50  % User time                : 0.295 s
% 0.59/0.50  % System time              : 0.032 s
% 0.59/0.50  % Total time               : 0.328 s
% 0.59/0.50  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.59/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------