%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP752-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n005.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:08:19 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 20.22s 2.98s % Output : CNFRefutation 20.22s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.11 % Problem : GRP752-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 09:11:09 EDT 2022 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.11/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.11/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN % 0.11/0.36 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.11/0.36 # % 0.11/0.36 # Number of axioms: 8 Number of unprocessed: 8 % 0.11/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.11/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.11/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.11/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.11/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.11/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.11/0.36 # 8 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.11/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.11/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.11/0.36 # Found 8 unit axioms. % 0.11/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.11/0.36 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.11/0.36 # 8 unit axiom clauses % 0.11/0.36 % 0.11/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.11/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.11/0.36 # Creating equality axioms % 0.11/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.11/0.36 # Returning from population with 15 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.11/0.36 # We now have 15 tableaux to operate on % 20.22/2.98 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 20.22/2.98 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 20.22/2.98 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 20.22/2.98 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 20.22/2.98 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 20.22/2.98 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 20.22/2.98 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 20.22/2.98 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 20.22/2.98 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 20.22/2.98 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 20.22/2.98 # Begin clausification derivation % 20.22/2.98 % 20.22/2.98 # End clausification derivation % 20.22/2.98 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (ld(X1,mult(X1,X2))=X2)). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (mult(X1,ld(X1,X2))=X2)). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (mult(rd(X1,X2),X2)=X1)). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (rd(mult(X1,X2),X2)=X1)). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X3,X3))=mult(mult(X1,X3),mult(X2,X3)))). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (mult(mult(X1,X1),mult(X2,X3))=mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X1,X3)))). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (mult(mult(a,c),mult(b,ld(c,c)))!=mult(mult(a,b),c))). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (mult(mult(X1,mult(X1,X1)),mult(X2,X3))=mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(mult(X1,X1),X3)))). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (X4=X4)). % 20.22/2.98 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 20.22/2.98 # Begin printing tableau % 20.22/2.98 # Found 6 steps % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (mult(ld(X1,mult(X1,mult(a,c))),ld(ld(X1,mult(X1,mult(a,c))),mult(mult(a,b),c)))=mult(mult(a,b),c)), inference(start_rule)). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (mult(ld(X1,mult(X1,mult(a,c))),ld(ld(X1,mult(X1,mult(a,c))),mult(mult(a,b),c)))=mult(mult(a,b),c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (mult(mult(a,c),mult(b,ld(c,c)))=mult(mult(a,b),c)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (mult(mult(a,c),mult(b,ld(c,c)))!=mult(ld(X1,mult(X1,mult(a,c))),ld(ld(X1,mult(X1,mult(a,c))),mult(mult(a,b),c)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_23])). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (mult(a,c)!=ld(X1,mult(X1,mult(a,c)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_10])). % 20.22/2.98 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (ld(ld(X1,mult(X1,mult(a,c))),mult(mult(a,b),c))!=mult(b,ld(c,c))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_66, ...])). % 20.22/2.98 # End printing tableau % 20.22/2.98 # SZS output end % 20.22/2.98 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 20.22/3.00 # Child (26533) has found a proof. % 20.22/3.00 % 20.22/3.00 # Proof search is over... % 20.22/3.00 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------