↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP754-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:41:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.70s 1.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  50 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   50 (  49 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  130 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(f02,axiom,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f02) ).

cnf(f05,axiom,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)) = mult(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),mult(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f05) ).

cnf(f04,axiom,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f04) ).

cnf(f06,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),X3) = mult(mult(X1,X3),mult(X2,ld(X3,X3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f06) ).

cnf(f01,axiom,
    mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f01) ).

cnf(f03,axiom,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f03) ).

cnf(goals,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(a,a),mult(b,c)) != mult(mult(a,b),mult(a,c)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
    f02 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)) = mult(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),mult(X1,X3)),
    f05 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    f04 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),X3) = mult(mult(X1,X3),mult(X2,ld(X3,X3))),
    f06 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ld(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),mult(X1,mult(X2,X3))) = mult(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
    f01 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    rd(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),mult(X2,ld(X3,X3))) = mult(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    f03 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ld(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),mult(X1,X3)) = mult(X1,ld(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),mult(X1,X3)) = mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,ld(ld(X3,X1),ld(X3,X1)))) = mult(mult(X3,X2),ld(X3,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),mult(X3,ld(X2,X2))) = mult(rd(X1,X3),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ld(mult(X1,X2),mult(mult(X1,X3),X2)) = mult(X3,ld(X2,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ld(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),X3) = mult(X1,ld(X2,ld(X1,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    mult(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),X3) = mult(X1,mult(X2,ld(X1,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    mult(rd(mult(X1,X2),X3),ld(X1,X3)) = mult(rd(X3,X3),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    mult(X1,ld(X2,mult(X3,ld(X1,X2)))) = mult(X3,ld(X2,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(ld(rd(X1,X1),X2),ld(X1,X3))) = mult(X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    mult(X1,mult(X2,ld(X1,ld(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),X3)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    rd(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),ld(X3,X1)) = rd(mult(X3,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ld(X1,mult(X2,ld(X3,X3))) = ld(X3,mult(X2,ld(X1,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    mult(ld(rd(X1,X1),X2),ld(X1,X3)) = ld(X1,mult(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    mult(X1,ld(ld(rd(X1,X1),X2),ld(X1,X3))) = ld(X2,X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_25]),c_0_20]),c_0_7]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,ld(rd(X2,X2),X3)),X2) = rd(X3,ld(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]),c_0_20]),c_0_7]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    mult(X1,ld(X2,mult(X3,ld(X1,X1)))) = mult(X3,ld(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    mult(ld(rd(X1,X1),X2),X3) = ld(X1,mult(X2,mult(X1,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ld(ld(rd(X1,X1),X2),ld(X1,mult(X2,X3))) = ld(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ld(ld(rd(X1,X1),X2),ld(X1,X3)) = ld(X1,ld(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ld(rd(X1,X2),X1) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    mult(rd(X1,X1),rd(X2,X3)) = rd(mult(X1,X2),mult(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,ld(X2,X2)),ld(X2,X3)) = rd(X2,ld(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ld(X1,mult(X2,mult(X1,ld(ld(rd(X1,X1),X2),X3)))) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_32]),c_0_20]),c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_7]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ld(ld(rd(X1,X1),X2),X3) = ld(X1,ld(X2,mult(X1,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    mult(X1,ld(rd(mult(X1,ld(X2,X2)),X3),X2)) = mult(X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    mult(X1,ld(rd(X2,X3),ld(X1,X4))) = ld(rd(mult(X1,X2),mult(X1,X3)),X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    mult(X1,ld(ld(X2,X3),ld(X2,X3))) = ld(X3,mult(mult(X2,X1),ld(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,ld(X2,X2)),X3) = rd(X2,ld(X1,mult(X2,X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ld(mult(X1,X1),mult(X2,mult(X1,X3))) = mult(ld(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_23]),c_0_43]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(a,a),mult(b,c)) != mult(mult(a,b),mult(a,c)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X1),mult(ld(X1,X2),X3)) = mult(X2,mult(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    mult(mult(a,a),mult(b,c)) != mult(mult(a,b),mult(a,c)),
    c_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    mult(mult(X1,X1),mult(X2,X3)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP754-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.44  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:37:51 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.70/1.85  % Version: 3.5.1
% 6.70/1.85  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.70/1.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % new_bool_3 with pid 1449519 completed with status 9
% 6.70/1.85  % new_bool_1 with pid 1449520 completed with status 9
% 6.70/1.85  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1449518 completed with status 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 6.70/1.85  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.70/1.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.70/1.85  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.70/1.85  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 6.70/1.85  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting E---G----_X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1449522 completed with status 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 6.70/1.85  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.70/1.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.70/1.85  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.70/1.85  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 6.70/1.85  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.70/1.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.70/1.85  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 6.70/1.85  
% 6.70/1.85  % Proof found!
% 6.70/1.85  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.70/1.85  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.70/1.85  % Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 6.70/1.85  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Initial clauses                      : 7
% 6.70/1.85  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 6.70/1.85  % Processed clauses                    : 663
% 6.70/1.85  % ...of these trivial                  : 288
% 6.70/1.85  % ...subsumed                          : 123
% 6.70/1.85  % ...remaining for further processing  : 252
% 6.70/1.85  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Backward-rewritten                   : 62
% 6.70/1.85  % Generated clauses                    : 42853
% 6.70/1.85  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 38915
% 6.70/1.85  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Paramodulations                      : 42853
% 6.70/1.85  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % NegExts                              : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Total rewrite steps                  : 42223
% 6.70/1.85  % ...of those cached                   : 30665
% 6.70/1.85  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.70/1.85  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 6.70/1.85  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.70/1.85  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 6.70/1.85  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.70/1.85  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 6.70/1.85  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 6.70/1.85  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 6.70/1.85  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 6.70/1.85  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 6.70/1.85  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 6.70/1.85  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 6.70/1.85  % Current number of processed clauses  : 190
% 6.70/1.85  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 175
% 6.70/1.85  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 15
% 6.70/1.85  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 6.70/1.85  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 38032
% 6.70/1.85  % ...number of literals in the above   : 38032
% 6.70/1.85  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Current number of archived clauses   : 62
% 6.70/1.85  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 163
% 6.70/1.85  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 1
% 6.70/1.85  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 929
% 6.70/1.85  % BW rewrite match successes           : 88
% 6.70/1.85  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.70/1.85  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 873181
% 6.70/1.85  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 6.70/1.85  
% 6.70/1.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.70/1.85  % User time                : 1.228 s
% 6.70/1.85  % System time              : 0.066 s
% 6.70/1.85  % Total time               : 1.294 s
% 6.70/1.85  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 6.70/1.85  
% 6.70/1.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.70/1.85  % User time                : 6.274 s
% 6.70/1.85  % System time              : 0.345 s
% 6.70/1.85  % Total time               : 6.620 s
% 6.70/1.85  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 6.70/1.85  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------