↑ Up

Moca---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : HEN003-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 12:58:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.76s 4.77s
% Output   : Proof 4.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : HEN003-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 14:22:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.76/4.77  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.76/4.77  % SZS output start Proof
% 4.76/4.77  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(X, Y) ==> divide(X, Y) = zero
% 4.76/4.77  	divide(X, Y) = zero ==> less_equal(X, Y)
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(divide(X, Y), X)
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(divide(divide(X, Z), divide(Y, Z)), divide(divide(X, Y), Z))
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(zero, X)
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(X, Y) & less_equal(Y, X) ==> X = Y
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(X, identity)
% 4.76/4.77  	divide(a, a) = zero ==> \bottom
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  This holds because
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  E:
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(less_equal(X, Y), X, Y) = zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, X, Y) = divide(X, Y)
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(divide(X, Y), X, Y) = true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, X, Y) = less_equal(X, Y)
% 4.76/4.77  	f3(true__, X, Y) = X
% 4.76/4.77  	f4(less_equal(Y, X), X, Y) = Y
% 4.76/4.77  	f4(true__, X, Y) = f3(less_equal(X, Y), X, Y)
% 4.76/4.77  	f5(divide(a, a)) = true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f5(zero) = false__
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(X, identity) = true__
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(divide(X, Y), X) = true__
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(divide(divide(X, Z), divide(Y, Z)), divide(divide(X, Y), Z)) = true__
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(zero, X) = true__
% 4.76/4.77  G:
% 4.76/4.77  	true__ = false__
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  This holds because
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  	divide(X, Y) -> f1(true__, X, Y)
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(f2(zero, Y0, Y1), Y0, Y1) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, X0, X0) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, Y0, identity) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, f1(true__, X0, X1), f1(true__, identity, X1)) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, f1(true__, X0, f1(true__, identity, zero)), zero) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, f1(true__, Y1, X1), Y1) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, f1(true__, f1(true__, X0, X1), X2), X0) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, f1(true__, f1(true__, X0, X1), X2), f1(true__, X0, X2)) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, f1(true__, f1(true__, X0, X1), X2), f1(true__, identity, X1)) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, f1(true__, f1(true__, X0, X1), zero), f1(true__, f1(true__, X0, zero), X1)) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, f1(true__, f1(true__, Y0, f1(true__, Y0, zero)), zero), zero) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f1(true__, zero, Y1) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(f1(true__, Y0, Y1), Y0, Y1) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, Y0, identity) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, Y1, Y1) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, divide(divide(Y0, Y1), divide(Y2, Y1)), divide(divide(Y0, Y2), Y1)) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, divide(divide(Y0, Y1), zero), divide(divide(Y0, divide(Y1, X1)), Y1)) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, f1(true__, X0, X1), f1(true__, identity, X1)) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, f1(true__, Y0, Y1), Y0) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, f1(true__, f1(true__, X0, X1), X2), f1(true__, X0, X2)) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, f1(true__, f1(true__, X0, X1), X2), f1(true__, identity, X1)) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, f1(true__, f1(true__, Y0, Y1), zero), f1(true__, f1(true__, Y0, zero), Y1)) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, f1(true__, f1(true__, Y0, f1(true__, Y0, zero)), zero), zero) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, f1(true__, f1(true__, Y0, f1(true__, identity, zero)), zero), zero) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, f1(true__, f1(true__, Y1, X1), X2), Y1) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f2(zero, zero, Y1) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f3(f2(zero, Y1, f1(true__, Y1, X1)), Y1, f1(true__, Y1, X1)) -> f1(true__, Y1, X1)
% 4.76/4.77  	f3(f2(zero, Y1, zero), Y1, zero) -> zero
% 4.76/4.77  	f3(f2(zero, identity, Y0), identity, Y0) -> Y0
% 4.76/4.77  	f3(true__, X, Y) -> X
% 4.76/4.77  	f4(f2(zero, Y0, Y1), Y1, Y0) -> Y0
% 4.76/4.77  	f4(true__, X, Y) -> f3(f2(zero, X, Y), X, Y)
% 4.76/4.77  	f5(f1(true__, a, a)) -> true__
% 4.76/4.77  	f5(zero) -> false__
% 4.76/4.77  	less_equal(X, Y) -> f2(zero, X, Y)
% 4.76/4.77  	true__ -> false__
% 4.76/4.77  with the LPO induced by
% 4.76/4.77  	f4 > less_equal > f2 > divide > f1 > zero > a > f3 > identity > f5 > true__ > false__
% 4.76/4.77  
% 4.76/4.77  % SZS output end Proof
% 4.76/4.77  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------