↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : HEN004-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:37:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.61s 6.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  24 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  142 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  39   ~;  35   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   0 sgn  71   !;   0   ?;  53   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( less_equal(X0,X1)
      | ~ quotient(X0,X1,zero) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',less_equal_quotient) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( less_equal(X2,X0)
      | ~ quotient(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',divisor_existence) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
      ( less_equal(X6,X7)
      | ~ quotient(X2,X3,X7)
      | ~ quotient(X5,X4,X6)
      | ~ quotient(X0,X3,X5)
      | ~ quotient(X1,X3,X4)
      | ~ quotient(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',quotient_property) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] : less_equal(zero,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',zero_is_smallest) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ less_equal(X1,X0)
      | ~ less_equal(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',less_equal_and_equal) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0] : quotient(zero,X0,zero),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',zero_divide_anything_is_zero) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : quotient(X0,X0,zero),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_divide_x_is_zero) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ quotient(x,zero,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_x_divde_zero_is_x) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( less_equal(X0,X1)
      | ~ quotient(X0,X1,zero) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( less_equal(X2,X0)
      | ~ quotient(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i,X7: $i] :
      ( less_equal(X7,X6)
      | ~ quotient(X4,X5,X7)
      | ~ quotient(X2,X3,X6)
      | ~ quotient(X1,X3,X5)
      | ~ quotient(X0,X3,X4)
      | ~ quotient(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(zero,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ less_equal(X1,X0)
      | ~ less_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : quotient(zero,X0,zero),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : quotient(X0,X0,zero),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_74,negated_conjecture,
    ~ quotient(x,zero,x),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_83,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(zero,X0) = zero,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_84,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(X0,X0) = zero,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    divide(x,zero) != x,
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( less_equal(X0,X1)
      | ( divide(X0,X1) != zero ) ),
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).

tcf(c_88,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( less_equal(X2,X0)
      | ( divide(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

tcf(c_90,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i,X7: $i] :
      ( less_equal(X7,X6)
      | ( divide(X4,X5) != X7 )
      | ( divide(X2,X3) != X6 )
      | ( divide(X1,X3) != X5 )
      | ( divide(X0,X3) != X4 )
      | ( divide(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(well_definedness,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

tcf(c_100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( divide(X0,X1) != X2 )
      | less_equal(X2,X0) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).

tcf(c_101,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( less_equal(X2,X0)
      | ( divide(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_100]) ).

tcf(c_182,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : less_equal(divide(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_101]) ).

tcf(c_196,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,X1),divide(X2,X1)),divide(divide(X0,X2),X1)),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_90]) ).

tcf(c_204,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( divide(X0,X1) != zero )
      | less_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_87]) ).

tcf(c_205,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( less_equal(X0,X1)
      | ( divide(X0,X1) != zero ) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_204]) ).

tcf(c_271,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = divide(x,zero),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_272,plain,
    iPr_def_10 != x,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_271]) ).

tcf(c_452,plain,
    less_equal(iPr_def_10,x),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_271,c_182]) ).

tcf(c_475,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = zero )
      | ~ less_equal(X0,zero) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_477,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( divide(X0,X1) = X0 )
      | ~ less_equal(X0,divide(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_182,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_567,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(x,X0),divide(zero,X0)),divide(iPr_def_10,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_271,c_196]) ).

tcf(c_580,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(x,X0),zero),divide(iPr_def_10,X0)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_567,c_83]) ).

tcf(c_605,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_10 = x )
    | ~ less_equal(iPr_def_10,x)
    | ~ less_equal(x,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).

tcf(c_608,plain,
    ( less_equal(x,iPr_def_10)
    | ( divide(x,iPr_def_10) != zero ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_205]) ).

tcf(c_795,plain,
    less_equal(divide(divide(x,iPr_def_10),zero),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_580]) ).

tcf(c_832,plain,
    divide(divide(x,iPr_def_10),zero) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_795,c_475]) ).

tcf(c_843,plain,
    ( ( divide(divide(x,iPr_def_10),zero) = divide(x,iPr_def_10) )
    | ~ less_equal(divide(x,iPr_def_10),zero) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_832,c_477]) ).

tcf(c_845,plain,
    less_equal(divide(x,iPr_def_10),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_832,c_205]) ).

tcf(c_860,plain,
    divide(divide(x,iPr_def_10),zero) = divide(x,iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_843,c_845]) ).

tcf(c_861,plain,
    divide(x,iPr_def_10) = zero,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_860,c_832]) ).

tcf(c_863,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_861,c_608,c_605,c_452,c_272]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : HEN004-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/5.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 16:12:23 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/5.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/5.42  
% 0.12/5.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/5.42  
% 0.12/5.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/5.43  % Proving...
% 3.61/6.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.61/6.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.61/6.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.61/6.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 4  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Proving...
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % 
% 3.61/6.28  % clauses                               12
% 3.61/6.28  % conjectures                           0
% 3.61/6.28  % EPR                                   4
% 3.61/6.28  % Horn                                  12
% 3.61/6.28  % unary                                 9
% 3.61/6.28  % binary                                2
% 3.61/6.28  % lits                                  16
% 3.61/6.28  % lits eq                               8
% 3.61/6.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.61/6.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.61/6.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.61/6.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 3.61/6.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ 
% 3.61/6.28  % Current options:
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ 
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % 
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % ------ Proving...
% 3.61/6.28  % 
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.61/6.28  
% 3.61/6.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------