%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HEN004-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:45:35 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 21 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 50 ( 26 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 50 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quotient_less_equal1,axiom,
( ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| divide(X1,X2) = zero ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',quotient_less_equal1) ).
cnf(quotient_smaller_than_numerator,axiom,
less_equal(divide(X1,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',quotient_smaller_than_numerator) ).
cnf(less_equal_and_equal,axiom,
( ~ less_equal(X2,X1)
| ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',less_equal_and_equal) ).
cnf(quotient_less_equal2,axiom,
( divide(X1,X2) != zero
| less_equal(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',quotient_less_equal2) ).
cnf(quotient_property,axiom,
less_equal(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2)),divide(divide(X1,X3),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',quotient_property) ).
cnf(zero_is_smallest,axiom,
less_equal(zero,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',zero_is_smallest) ).
cnf(prove_x_divide_zero_is_x,negated_conjecture,
divide(a,zero) != a,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_x_divide_zero_is_x) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| divide(X1,X2) = zero ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quotient_less_equal1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| divide(X1,X2) = zero ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
less_equal(divide(X1,X2),X1),
quotient_smaller_than_numerator ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ less_equal(X2,X1)
| ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_equal_and_equal]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( divide(X1,X2) != zero
| less_equal(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quotient_less_equal2]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
less_equal(divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2)),divide(divide(X1,X3),X2)),
quotient_property ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X2),X1) = zero,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
less_equal(zero,X1),
zero_is_smallest ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ less_equal(X2,X1)
| ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( divide(X1,X2) != zero
| less_equal(X1,X2) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
less_equal(divide(divide(X1,X1),divide(X2,X1)),zero),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
divide(zero,X1) = zero,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
| divide(X2,X1) != zero
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
less_equal(divide(divide(X1,X1),zero),zero),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( divide(X1,X2) != zero
| divide(X2,X1) != zero
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X1),zero) = zero,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
less_equal(divide(divide(X1,X2),zero),divide(divide(X1,zero),X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
divide(X1,X1) = zero,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
less_equal(divide(divide(X1,divide(X1,zero)),zero),zero),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( divide(X1,divide(X1,X2)) != zero
| divide(X1,X2) = X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
divide(divide(X1,divide(X1,zero)),zero) = zero,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_25]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
divide(a,zero) != a,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_x_divide_zero_is_x]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
divide(X1,divide(X1,zero)) = zero,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
divide(a,zero) != a,
c_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
divide(X1,zero) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_29]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HEN004-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:46:32 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1197774 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FHUSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1197779 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FHUSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses : 8
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.12/0.44 % Processed clauses : 46
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.12/0.44 % ...subsumed : 9
% 0.12/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 33
% 0.12/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.12/0.44 % Generated clauses : 324
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 143
% 0.12/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Paramodulations : 324
% 0.12/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 496
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of those cached : 406
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.12/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.12/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 97
% 0.12/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 125
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.12/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.12/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.12/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.12/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.12/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 30
% 0.12/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3527
% 0.12/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44 % User time : 0.021 s
% 0.12/0.44 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.12/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------