↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : HEN005-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 13:02:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.56s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (  11 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quotient_property,axiom,
    divide(divide(divide(X,Y),divide(Z,Y)),divide(divide(X,Z),Y)) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN003-0.ax',quotient_property) ).

cnf(zero_is_smallest,axiom,
    divide(zero,X) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN003-0.ax',zero_is_smallest) ).

cnf(divide_and_equal,axiom,
    ( divide(X,Y) != zero
    | divide(Y,X) != zero
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN003-0.ax',divide_and_equal) ).

cnf(a_divide_b_is_zero,hypothesis,
    divide(a,b) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_divide_b_is_zero) ).

cnf(b_divide_c_is_zero,hypothesis,
    divide(b,c) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_divide_c_is_zero) ).

cnf(prove_transitivity_of_divide_to_zero,negated_conjecture,
    divide(a,c) != zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_transitivity_of_divide_to_zero) ).

cnf(9,plain,
    divide(divide(a,c),zero) != zero,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[divide_and_equal,zero_is_smallest,prove_transitivity_of_divide_to_zero]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    divide(divide(divide(a,X),divide(b,X)),zero) = zero,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[quotient_property,a_divide_b_is_zero,theory(equality)]),zero_is_smallest,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    divide(divide(a,X),divide(b,X)) = zero,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[divide_and_equal,20,zero_is_smallest]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[42,b_divide_c_is_zero,theory(equality)]),9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.13  % Problem  : HEN005-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 13:12:29 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.49  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.51  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.51   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.51   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  "."
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-01T13:12:29
% 0.22/0.51  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-07-01T13:12:29
% 0.22/0.56  
% 0.22/0.56  
% 0.22/0.56  #||
% 0.22/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.56  ||#
% 0.22/0.56  
% 0.22/0.56  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.22/0.56  ;       239 formulas have been input or derived (from 22 formulas).
% 0.22/0.56  ;        43 (18%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.22/0.56  ;            7 (16%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.22/0.56  ;           36 (84%) are still being kept.
% 0.22/0.56  ; 
% 0.22/0.56  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.002   4%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (8 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.005  11%   Process new row              (186 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.004   9%   Resolution                   (42 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.007  15%   Paramodulation               (21 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (13 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (13 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (8 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (7 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.004   9%   Forward simplification       (137 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (43 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.001   2%   Ordering                     (257 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.023  50%   Other
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.046        Total
% 0.22/0.56  ;     0.048        Real time
% 0.22/0.56  ; 
% 0.22/0.56  ; Term-hash-array has 149 terms in all.
% 0.22/0.56  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 8 entries (8 at peak, 8 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.22/0.56  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 59 nodes (59 at peak, 59 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.22/0.56  ;  Retrieved 7 possibly forward subsuming rows in 13 calls.
% 0.22/0.56  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 8 calls.
% 0.22/0.56  ; Path-index has 138 entries (140 at peak, 154 added, 16 deleted).
% 0.22/0.56  ; Path-index has 296 nodes (297 at peak, 305 added, 9 deleted).
% 0.22/0.56  ; Trie-index has 138 entries (140 at peak, 154 added, 16 deleted).
% 0.22/0.56  ; Trie-index has 568 nodes (579 at peak, 613 added, 45 deleted).
% 0.22/0.56  ; Retrieved 247 generalization terms in 403 calls.
% 0.22/0.56  ; Retrieved 144 instance terms in 34 calls.
% 0.22/0.56  ; Retrieved 1,242 unifiable terms in 253 calls.
% 0.22/0.56  ; 
% 0.22/0.56  ; The agenda of rows to process has 9 entries:
% 0.22/0.56  ;     1 with value 13              1 with value 23               2 with value 27
% 0.22/0.56  ;     2 with value 14              1 with value 25               1 with value 28
% 0.40/0.56  ;     1 with value 16
% 0.40/0.56  ; The agenda of rows to give has 18 entries:
% 0.40/0.56  ;     1 with value (4 16)          2 with value (4 23)           1 with value (4 30)
% 0.40/0.56  ;     4 with value (4 18)          2 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 34)
% 0.40/0.56  ;     2 with value (4 19)          1 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 36)
% 0.40/0.56  ;     2 with value (4 21)          1 with value (4 28)
% 0.40/0.56  Evaluation took:
% 0.40/0.56    0.048 seconds of real time
% 0.40/0.56    0.041089 seconds of user run time
% 0.40/0.56    0.00673 seconds of system run time
% 0.40/0.56    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.40/0.56    0 page faults and
% 0.40/0.56    2,628,480 bytes consed.
% 0.40/0.56  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.40/0.56  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-01T13:12:29
% 0.40/0.56  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.40/0.56  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------