↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : HEN008-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:45:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   47 (  24 unt;   0 nHn;  37 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   94 (   9 equ;  50 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   96 (  15 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(divisor_existence,axiom,
    ( ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | less_equal(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',divisor_existence) ).

cnf(quotient_property,axiom,
    ( ~ quotient(X3,X4,X8)
    | ~ quotient(X6,X5,X7)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ quotient(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | less_equal(X7,X8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',quotient_property) ).

cnf(quotient_less_equal,axiom,
    ( ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
    | quotient(X1,X2,zero) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',quotient_less_equal) ).

cnf(closure,axiom,
    quotient(X1,X2,divide(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',closure) ).

cnf(well_defined,axiom,
    ( ~ quotient(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',well_defined) ).

cnf(identity_is_largest,axiom,
    less_equal(X1,identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',identity_is_largest) ).

cnf(bQc,hypothesis,
    quotient(b,c,bQc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',bQc) ).

cnf(aQc,hypothesis,
    quotient(a,c,aQc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aQc) ).

cnf(aLEb,hypothesis,
    less_equal(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aLEb) ).

cnf(less_equal_and_equal,axiom,
    ( ~ less_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',less_equal_and_equal) ).

cnf(zero_is_smallest,axiom,
    less_equal(zero,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',zero_is_smallest) ).

cnf(less_equal_quotient,axiom,
    ( ~ quotient(X1,X2,zero)
    | less_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN001-0.ax',less_equal_quotient) ).

cnf(prove_aQcLEbQc,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_equal(aQc,bQc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_aQcLEbQc) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | less_equal(X3,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[divisor_existence]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X3,X4,X8)
    | ~ quotient(X6,X5,X7)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ quotient(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | less_equal(X7,X8) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quotient_property]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
    | quotient(X1,X2,zero) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quotient_less_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | less_equal(X3,X1) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    quotient(X1,X2,divide(X1,X2)),
    closure ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X3,X4,X8)
    | ~ quotient(X6,X5,X7)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ quotient(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | less_equal(X7,X8) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
    | quotient(X1,X2,zero) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    less_equal(divide(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X7,X6,X4)
    | ~ quotient(X7,X5,X1)
    | ~ quotient(X6,X5,X2)
    | ~ quotient(X4,X5,X3)
    | less_equal(divide(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    quotient(divide(X1,X2),X1,zero),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[well_defined]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    less_equal(X1,identity),
    identity_is_largest ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X3,X5,X1)
    | ~ quotient(X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ quotient(X3,X4,divide(X5,X6))
    | less_equal(divide(X1,X2),zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    quotient(b,c,bQc),
    bQc ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    quotient(X1,identity,zero),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    ( ~ quotient(X2,c,X1)
    | ~ quotient(X2,b,divide(c,X3))
    | less_equal(divide(X1,bQc),zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    quotient(a,c,aQc),
    aQc ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X2,identity,X1)
    | X1 = zero ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    less_equal(a,b),
    aLEb ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ less_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_equal_and_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    ( ~ quotient(a,b,divide(c,X1))
    | less_equal(divide(aQc,bQc),zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    divide(X1,identity) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    quotient(a,b,zero),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ less_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    less_equal(divide(aQc,bQc),zero),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
    less_equal(zero,X1),
    zero_is_smallest ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X1,X2,zero)
    | less_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_equal_quotient]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    divide(aQc,bQc) = zero,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_equal(aQc,bQc),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_aQcLEbQc]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ quotient(X1,X2,zero)
    | less_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
    quotient(aQc,bQc,zero),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_equal(aQc,bQc),
    c_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : HEN008-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:46:03 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.50  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1739107 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.50  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.50  % Search class: FHUSS-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.50  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % new_bool_3 with pid 1739114 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.50  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.50  % Search class: FHUSS-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.50  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.50  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.50  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.50  % Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.13/0.50  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.13/0.50  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.13/0.50  % Processed clauses                    : 192
% 0.13/0.50  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.13/0.50  % ...subsumed                          : 22
% 0.13/0.50  % ...remaining for further processing  : 169
% 0.13/0.50  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Backward-subsumed                    : 8
% 0.13/0.50  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.13/0.50  % Generated clauses                    : 351
% 0.13/0.50  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 207
% 0.13/0.50  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Paramodulations                      : 351
% 0.13/0.50  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Total rewrite steps                  : 211
% 0.13/0.50  % ...of those cached                   : 165
% 0.13/0.50  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.50  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.50  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.50  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.50  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.50  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.50  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.50  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.50  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.50  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.50  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.50  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.50  % Current number of processed clauses  : 145
% 0.13/0.50  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 0.13/0.50  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.50  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.13/0.50  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 119
% 0.13/0.50  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 30
% 0.13/0.50  % ...number of literals in the above   : 86
% 0.13/0.50  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 0.13/0.50  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2841
% 0.13/0.50  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2308
% 0.13/0.50  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 30
% 0.13/0.50  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.13/0.50  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 10
% 0.13/0.50  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.13/0.50  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.50  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 6005
% 0.13/0.50  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 30
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.50  % User time                : 0.027 s
% 0.13/0.50  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.50  % Total time               : 0.030 s
% 0.13/0.50  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.50  % User time                : 0.114 s
% 0.13/0.50  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.13/0.50  % Total time               : 0.131 s
% 0.13/0.50  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------