↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : HEN009-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:24:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.06s 6.22s
% Output   : Refutation 6.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   6 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    divide(identity,a) != divide(identity,divide(identity,divide(identity,a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(less_equal_and_equal,axiom,
    ( ~ less_equal(X32,X31)
    | ~ less_equal(X31,X32)
    | X32 = X31 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',less_equal_and_equal) ).

cnf(x_divide_x_is_zero,axiom,
    divide(X7,X7) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_divide_x_is_zero) ).

cnf(quotient_less_equal2,axiom,
    ( divide(X17,X16) != zero
    | less_equal(X17,X16) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',quotient_less_equal2) ).

cnf(c10,plain,
    less_equal(X18,X18),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[quotient_less_equal2,x_divide_x_is_zero]) ).

cnf(property_of_divide1,axiom,
    ( ~ less_equal(divide(X47,X46),X45)
    | less_equal(divide(X47,X45),X46) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',property_of_divide1) ).

cnf(c35,plain,
    less_equal(divide(X88,divide(X88,X87)),X87),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[property_of_divide1,c10]) ).

cnf(c90,plain,
    ( ~ less_equal(X472,divide(X471,divide(X471,X472)))
    | X472 = divide(X471,divide(X471,X472)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c35,less_equal_and_equal]) ).

cnf(property_of_divide2,axiom,
    ( ~ less_equal(X60,X59)
    | less_equal(divide(X58,X59),divide(X58,X60)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',property_of_divide2) ).

cnf(c93,plain,
    less_equal(divide(X500,X499),divide(X500,divide(X498,divide(X498,X499)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c35,property_of_divide2]) ).

cnf(c658,plain,
    divide(X5157,X5158) = divide(X5157,divide(X5157,divide(X5157,X5158))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c93,c90]) ).

cnf(c13035,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c658,prove_this]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : HEN009-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed May  8 13:53:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.06/6.22  % Version:  1.5
% 6.06/6.22  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.06/6.22  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.06/6.22  
% 6.06/6.22  % Initial clauses    : 21
% 6.06/6.22  % Processed clauses  : 400
% 6.06/6.22  % Factors computed   : 20
% 6.06/6.22  % Resolvents computed: 13017
% 6.06/6.22  % Tautologies deleted: 4
% 6.06/6.22  % Forward subsumed   : 2014
% 6.06/6.22  % Backward subsumed  : 19
% 6.06/6.22  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 6.06/6.22  % User time          : 5.857 s
% 6.06/6.22  % System time        : 0.027 s
% 6.06/6.22  % Total time         : 5.884 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------