↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : HEN010-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:37:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.87s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   77 (  64 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  190 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  20   ~;  16   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   0 sgn  63   !;   0   ?;  50   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( divide(X0,X1) = zero
      | ~ less_equal(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',quotient_less_equal1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( less_equal(X0,X1)
      | divide(X0,X1) != zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',quotient_less_equal2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : less_equal(divide(X0,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',quotient_smaller_than_numerator) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,X1),divide(X2,X1)),divide(divide(X0,X2),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',quotient_property) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] : less_equal(zero,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',zero_is_smallest) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ less_equal(X1,X0)
      | ~ less_equal(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',less_equal_and_equal) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] : less_equal(X0,identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HEN002-0.ax',identity_is_largest) ).

fof(f8,negated_conjecture,
    divide(identity,a) != divide(divide(identity,a),divide(identity,divide(identity,a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_property_of_inversion) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( divide(X0,X1) = zero )
      | ~ less_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( less_equal(X0,X1)
      | ( divide(X0,X1) != zero ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : less_equal(divide(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,X1),divide(X2,X1)),divide(divide(X0,X2),X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(zero,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ less_equal(X1,X0)
      | ~ less_equal(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(X0,identity),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    divide(divide(identity,a),divide(identity,divide(identity,a))) != divide(identity,a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_129,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = divide(identity,a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_130,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = divide(identity,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_131,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = divide(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_132,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_12 != iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_130,c_129,c_131]) ).

tcf(c_306,plain,
    less_equal(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_309,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : divide(divide(X0,X1),X0) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_310,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(zero,X0) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_311,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(X0,identity) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_336,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = zero )
      | ~ less_equal(X0,zero) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_338,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_12 )
    | ~ less_equal(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_306,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_349,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(iPr_def_10,divide(X0,a)),divide(divide(identity,X0),a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_351,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(iPr_def_12,divide(X0,iPr_def_11)),divide(divide(iPr_def_10,X0),iPr_def_11)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_352,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,a),iPr_def_10),divide(divide(X0,identity),a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_353,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11),divide(divide(X0,identity),iPr_def_10)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_360,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11),divide(zero,iPr_def_10)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_311]) ).

tcf(c_361,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,a),iPr_def_10),divide(zero,a)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_352,c_311]) ).

tcf(c_375,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_10 )
    | ~ less_equal(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ less_equal(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).

tcf(c_390,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,X1),zero),divide(divide(X0,zero),X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_310,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_434,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,X0),divide(X1,X0)),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_309,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_477,plain,
    ~ less_equal(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_338,c_132,c_306,c_375]) ).

tcf(c_479,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11),zero),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_360,c_310]) ).

tcf(c_487,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(divide(X0,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_479,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_679,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,a),iPr_def_10),zero),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_361,c_310]) ).

tcf(c_686,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(divide(X0,a),iPr_def_10) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_679,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_726,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(X0,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_487,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_733,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,iPr_def_11),divide(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_487,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_734,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12),zero),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_733,c_131]) ).

tcf(c_792,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(divide(X0,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_734,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_843,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(X0,a),iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_686,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_850,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,iPr_def_10),divide(a,iPr_def_10)),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_686,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_887,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(X0,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_792,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_950,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,X0),zero),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_309,c_434]) ).

tcf(c_982,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(divide(X0,X0),zero) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_950,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_993,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(X0,X0),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_982,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_1029,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(X0,X0) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_993,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_1141,plain,
    less_equal(divide(iPr_def_11,divide(a,iPr_def_10)),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_850]) ).

tcf(c_1154,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_11,divide(a,iPr_def_10)) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1141,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_1170,plain,
    less_equal(iPr_def_11,divide(a,iPr_def_10)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1154,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_1201,plain,
    ( ( divide(a,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_11 )
    | ~ less_equal(divide(a,iPr_def_10),iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1170,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_1203,plain,
    divide(a,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1201,c_726]) ).

tcf(c_1207,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_11,a) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1203,c_309]) ).

tcf(c_1421,plain,
    less_equal(divide(iPr_def_10,zero),divide(divide(identity,iPr_def_11),a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1207,c_349]) ).

tcf(c_1807,plain,
    less_equal(divide(iPr_def_12,divide(identity,iPr_def_11)),divide(zero,iPr_def_11)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_311,c_351]) ).

tcf(c_1833,plain,
    less_equal(divide(iPr_def_12,divide(identity,iPr_def_11)),zero),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1807,c_310]) ).

tcf(c_1836,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_12,divide(identity,iPr_def_11)) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1833,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_1841,plain,
    less_equal(iPr_def_12,divide(identity,iPr_def_11)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1836,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_1867,plain,
    ( ( divide(identity,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_12 )
    | ~ less_equal(divide(identity,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1841,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_1869,plain,
    divide(identity,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1867,c_887]) ).

tcf(c_1872,plain,
    less_equal(divide(iPr_def_10,zero),divide(iPr_def_12,a)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1421,c_1869]) ).

tcf(c_2306,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(divide(X0,divide(X0,zero)),zero),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1029,c_390]) ).

tcf(c_2819,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(divide(X0,divide(X0,zero)),zero) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2306,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_3882,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(divide(X0,divide(X0,zero)),zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2819,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_3955,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(X0,divide(X0,zero)) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3882,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_3970,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : less_equal(X0,divide(X0,zero)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3955,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_4180,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( divide(X0,zero) = X0 )
      | ~ less_equal(divide(X0,zero),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3970,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_4184,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4180,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_4198,plain,
    less_equal(iPr_def_10,divide(iPr_def_12,a)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1872,c_4184]) ).

tcf(c_4219,plain,
    ( ( divide(iPr_def_12,a) = iPr_def_10 )
    | ~ less_equal(divide(iPr_def_12,a),iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4198,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_4221,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_12,a) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4219,c_843]) ).

tcf(c_4296,plain,
    less_equal(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4221,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_4308,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4296,c_477]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : HEN010-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 16:16:33 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.42  % Proving...
% 0.87/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.87/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.87/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % 
% 0.87/1.29  % clauses                               11
% 0.87/1.29  % conjectures                           1
% 0.87/1.29  % EPR                                   4
% 0.87/1.29  % Horn                                  11
% 0.87/1.29  % unary                                 8
% 0.87/1.29  % binary                                2
% 0.87/1.29  % lits                                  15
% 0.87/1.29  % lits eq                               7
% 0.87/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.87/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.87/1.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.87/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 0.87/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ 
% 0.87/1.29  % Current options:
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ 
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % 
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 0.87/1.29  % 
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.87/1.29  
% 0.87/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------