↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : HWC001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.1.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:32:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.36s 12.57s
% Output   : Refutation 3.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  17 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (  10 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   96 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &;  86   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0   ^;  24   !;   0   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(output_decl,type,
    output: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(nand_decl,type,
    nand: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(n0_decl,type,
    n0: $i ).

thf(n1_decl,type,
    n1: $i ).

thf(not_decl,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

thf(and_decl,type,
    and: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [H: $i,G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( H @ ( D @ nand ) @ ( G @ ( C @ nand ) @ ( F @ ( B @ nand ) @ ( E @ ( A @ nand ) @ output ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( H @ ( G @ ( F @ ( E @ output ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ output ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nand_table_definition) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [H: $i,G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( H @ ( D @ nand ) @ ( G @ ( C @ nand ) @ ( F @ ( B @ nand ) @ ( E @ ( A @ nand ) @ output ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( H @ ( G @ ( F @ ( E @ output ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ output ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ( ( n1 @ not )
    = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_definition2) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ( ( n1 @ not )
    = n0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ and ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_definition2) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n1 @ ( A @ and ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( n1 @ ( n1 @ ( n1 @ ( n0 @ output ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cannot_make_or) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ~ ( n1 @ ( n1 @ ( n1 @ ( n0 @ output ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ( ( n0 @ not )
    = n1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_definition1) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( n0 @ not )
    = n1 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(3,negated_conjecture,
    n1 @ ( n0 @ ( n1 @ ( n0 @ output ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',input2) ).

thf(12,plain,
    n1 @ ( n0 @ ( n1 @ ( n0 @ output ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ and ) )
      = n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_definition1) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( n0 @ ( A @ and ) )
      = n0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ nand ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ not ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nand_definition) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ nand ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ and ) @ not ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    n1 @ ( n1 @ ( n0 @ ( n0 @ output ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',input1) ).

thf(11,plain,
    n1 @ ( n1 @ ( n0 @ ( n0 @ output ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,24,20,13,22,12,18,16,11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : HWC001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.1.1.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/10.63  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/10.63  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/10.63  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/10.63  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/10.63  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/10.63  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/10.63  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/10.63  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 15:58:45 UTC 2026
% 0.14/10.64  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/10.64  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.98/11.23  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.33/11.42  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (185ms). 
% 1.33/11.43  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.92/11.84  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.92/11.85  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.13/11.95  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.13/12.00  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.13/12.01  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.13/12.01  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.13/12.01  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.36/12.56  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.36/12.56  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.36/12.57  % Time passed: 1782ms (effective reasoning time: 1127ms)
% 3.36/12.57  % Axioms used in derivation (5): and_definition1, and_definition2, not_definition1, nand_definition, not_definition2
% 3.36/12.57  % No. of inferences in proof: 19
% 3.36/12.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1782 ms resp. 1127 ms w/o parsing
% 3.75/12.61  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.75/12.61  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------