↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : HWC001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.1.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:32:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 5.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   26
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  44 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   68 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  17   ~;  15   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   1 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(nand_definition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : nand(VAR_0,VAR_1) = not(and(VAR_0,VAR_1)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',nand_definition) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    nand(A,B) = not(and(A,B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[nand_definition]) ).

fof(and_definition1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : and(VAR_0,n0) = n0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',and_definition1) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    and(A,n0) = n0,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[and_definition1]) ).

fof(and_definition2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : and(VAR_0,n1) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',and_definition2) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    and(A,n1) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[and_definition2]) ).

fof(not_definition1,axiom,
    not(n0) = n1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',not_definition1) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    not(n0) = n1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[not_definition1]) ).

fof(not_definition2,axiom,
    not(n1) = n0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',not_definition2) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    not(n1) = n0,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[not_definition2]) ).

fof(nand_table_definition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5,VAR_6,VAR_7] :
      ( output(nand(VAR_0,VAR_4),nand(VAR_1,VAR_5),nand(VAR_2,VAR_6),nand(VAR_3,VAR_7))
      | ~ output(VAR_4,VAR_5,VAR_6,VAR_7)
      | ~ output(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',nand_table_definition) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( output(nand(A,E),nand(B,F),nand(C,V6),nand(D,V7))
    | ~ output(E,F,V6,V7)
    | ~ output(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[nand_table_definition]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( output(not(and(A,E)),nand(B,F),nand(C,V6),nand(D,V7))
    | ~ output(E,F,V6,V7)
    | ~ output(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( output(not(and(A,E)),not(and(B,F)),nand(C,V6),nand(D,V7))
    | ~ output(E,F,V6,V7)
    | ~ output(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( output(not(and(A,E)),not(and(B,F)),not(and(C,V6)),nand(D,V7))
    | ~ output(E,F,V6,V7)
    | ~ output(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ( output(not(and(A,E)),not(and(B,F)),not(and(C,V6)),not(and(D,V7)))
    | ~ output(E,F,V6,V7)
    | ~ output(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_20]) ).

fof(input1,axiom,
    output(n0,n0,n1,n1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',input1) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    output(n0,n0,n1,n1),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[input1]) ).

fof(input2,axiom,
    output(n0,n1,n0,n1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',input2) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    output(n0,n1,n0,n1),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[input2]) ).

fof(prove_cannot_make_or,axiom,
    ~ output(n0,n1,n1,n1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_cannot_make_or) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ~ output(n0,n1,n1,n1),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_cannot_make_or]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    ( output(not(and(n0,A)),not(and(n0,B)),not(and(n1,C)),not(and(n1,D)))
    | ~ output(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    output(not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n1,n1)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    output(not(n0),not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n1,n1)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    output(n1,not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n1,n1)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    output(n1,not(n0),not(and(n1,n1)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    output(n1,n1,not(and(n1,n1)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    output(n1,n1,not(n1),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    output(n1,n1,n0,not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    output(n1,n1,n0,not(n1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    output(n1,n1,n0,n0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_29]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    ( output(not(and(n0,A)),not(and(n1,B)),not(and(n0,C)),not(and(n1,D)))
    | ~ output(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    output(not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n1,n1)),not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    output(not(n0),not(and(n1,n1)),not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    output(n1,not(and(n1,n1)),not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_32]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    output(n1,not(n1),not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    output(n1,n0,not(and(n0,n0)),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    output(n1,n0,not(n0),not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    output(n1,n0,n1,not(and(n1,n1))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    output(n1,n0,n1,not(n1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    output(n1,n0,n1,n0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    ( output(not(and(n1,A)),not(and(n1,B)),not(and(n0,C)),not(and(n0,D)))
    | ~ output(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    output(not(and(n1,n1)),not(and(n1,n0)),not(and(n0,n1)),not(and(n0,n0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    output(not(n1),not(and(n1,n0)),not(and(n0,n1)),not(and(n0,n0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    output(n0,not(and(n1,n0)),not(and(n0,n1)),not(and(n0,n0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    output(n0,not(n0),not(and(n0,n1)),not(and(n0,n0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    output(n0,n1,not(and(n0,n1)),not(and(n0,n0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    output(n0,n1,not(n0),not(and(n0,n0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_44]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    output(n0,n1,n1,not(and(n0,n0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    output(n0,n1,n1,not(n0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    output(n0,n1,n1,n1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_47]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : HWC001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.1.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/5.58  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.58  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.58  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.58  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.58  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.58  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.58  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.58  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 15:58:21 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.58  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/5.58  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/5.58  % Process 788019 was started by sandbox on n013,
% 0.11/5.58  % Fri Sep 25 15:58:21 2026
% 0.11/5.58  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/5.58  
% 0.11/5.58  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/5.60  
% 0.14/5.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/5.60  
% 0.14/5.60  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/5.60  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.14/5.60  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.14/5.60  % Maximum clause weight is 27.000.
% 0.14/5.60  % Given clauses 11.
% 0.14/5.60  
% 0.14/5.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------