%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWC004-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:45:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.25s 0.56s
% Output : Saturation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named or_definition4ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_10ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
or(n1,n1) = n1,
or_definition4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
or(n1,n0) = n1,
or_definition3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
or(n0,n1) = n1,
or_definition2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
or(n0,n0) = n0,
or_definition1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
and(n1,n1) = n1,
and_definition4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
and(n1,n0) = n0,
and_definition3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
and(n0,n1) = n0,
and_definition2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
and(n0,n0) = n0,
and_definition1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
not(n1) = n0,
not_definition2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
not(n0) = n1,
not_definition1,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : HWC004-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.46 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:47:28 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.56 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 33505 completed with status 1
% 0.25/0.56 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.25/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.56 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.56 % partial match(2): FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 33509 completed with status 1
% 0.25/0.56 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.25/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.56 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.56 % partial match(2): FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.56
% 0.25/0.56 % No proof found!
% 0.25/0.56 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.25/0.56 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.56 % Parsed axioms : 10
% 0.25/0.56 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Initial clauses : 10
% 0.25/0.56 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.25/0.56 % Processed clauses : 10
% 0.25/0.56 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.25/0.56 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.25/0.56 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.25/0.56 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Termbank termtop insertions : 118
% 0.25/0.56 % Search garbage collected termcells : 0
% 0.25/0.56
% 0.25/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.56 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/0.56 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.56 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.25/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.25/0.56
% 0.25/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.56 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.25/0.56 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.25/0.56 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.25/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.25/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------