%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:47:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 6 unt; 4 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 11 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
( level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(axiom_29,axiom,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_29) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_21) ).
cnf(axiom_30,axiom,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_30) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
p_Reset(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_26) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
axiom_21 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( int_level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0
| p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p_Reset(t_139),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( int_level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
int_level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : HWV009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.47 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.47 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:48:33 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % new_bool_1 with pid 1203006 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.60 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1203010 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.60 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.60 % Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.20/0.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 33
% 0.20/0.60 % Initial clauses : 59
% 0.20/0.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 59
% 0.20/0.60 % Processed clauses : 200
% 0.20/0.60 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.20/0.60 % ...subsumed : 89
% 0.20/0.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 107
% 0.20/0.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Backward-subsumed : 10
% 0.20/0.60 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.20/0.60 % Generated clauses : 585
% 0.20/0.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 397
% 0.20/0.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 12
% 0.20/0.60 % Paramodulations : 578
% 0.20/0.60 % Factorizations : 6
% 0.20/0.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.20/0.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Total rewrite steps : 176
% 0.20/0.60 % ...of those cached : 155
% 0.20/0.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 96
% 0.20/0.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 83
% 0.20/0.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 251
% 0.20/0.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 1120
% 0.20/0.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.20/0.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 679
% 0.20/0.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 403
% 0.20/0.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 96
% 0.20/0.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.20/0.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.20/0.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 10926
% 0.20/0.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 248
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % User time : 0.017 s
% 0.20/0.60 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.60 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 3704 pages
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % User time : 0.025 s
% 0.20/0.60 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.60 % Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.20/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------