%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 5.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 6 unt; 4 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 9 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_26) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
( level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_21) ).
cnf(axiom_29,axiom,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_29) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
p_Reset(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(axiom_30,axiom,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_30) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
axiom_21 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p_Reset(t_139),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HWV009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.51 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.51 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.51 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.51 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.51 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.51 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.51 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.51 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:49:48 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.51 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.51 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/5.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/5.58 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/5.58 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/5.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 169797 completed with status 0
% 0.09/5.58 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.09/5.58 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/5.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/5.58 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/5.58 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/5.58 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % new_bool_3 with pid 169807 completed with status 0
% 0.09/5.58 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.09/5.58 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/5.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/5.58 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/5.58 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/5.58 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/5.58 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.09/5.58 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.09/5.58
% 0.09/5.58 % Proof found!
% 0.09/5.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.09/5.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/5.58 % Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.09/5.58 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.09/5.58 % Initial clauses : 92
% 0.09/5.58 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.09/5.58 % Initial clauses in saturation : 91
% 0.09/5.58 % Processed clauses : 115
% 0.09/5.58 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/5.58 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.09/5.58 % ...remaining for further processing : 114
% 0.09/5.58 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.09/5.58 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/5.58 % Backward-subsumed : 17
% 0.09/5.58 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.09/5.58 % Generated clauses : 13
% 0.09/5.58 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.09/5.58 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 61
% 0.09/5.59 % Paramodulations : 10
% 0.09/5.59 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.09/5.59 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.09/5.59 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.09/5.59 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/5.59 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/5.59 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/5.59 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/5.59 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/5.59 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/5.59 % Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.09/5.59 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.09/5.59 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.09/5.59 % Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 0.09/5.59 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% 0.09/5.59 % ...number of literals in the above : 211
% 0.09/5.59 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Current number of archived clauses : 93
% 0.09/5.59 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1738
% 0.09/5.59 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 209
% 0.09/5.59 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 79
% 0.09/5.59 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.09/5.59 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.09/5.59 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.09/5.59 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/5.59 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5609
% 0.09/5.59 % Search garbage collected termcells : 189
% 0.09/5.59
% 0.09/5.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/5.59 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.09/5.59 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.09/5.59 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.09/5.59 % Maximum resident set size: 3704 pages
% 0.09/5.59
% 0.09/5.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/5.59 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.09/5.59 % System time : 0.022 s
% 0.09/5.59 % Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.09/5.59 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/5.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------