%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV009-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 9 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) != n0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(axiom_12,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_12) ).
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_5) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) != n0,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) != n0,
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
axiom_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) != n0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HWV009-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:52:38 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 787040 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 787044 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 135
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 111
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses : 24
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 24
% 0.15/0.43 % Processed clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.15/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.15/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Paramodulations : 3
% 0.15/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.15/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 45
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2259
% 0.15/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 523
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3744 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------