%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV009-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.82s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HWV009-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.75 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.75 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.75 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.75 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.75 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.75 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.75 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.75 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:53:13 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.76 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.76 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.80 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.80 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.82 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.82 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.82 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % sh5l with pid 1393292 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.82 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.82 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/0.82 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.82 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.82 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1393293 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.82 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.82 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/0.82 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.82 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.82 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.82 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.82 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.82
% 0.15/0.82 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.82 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.82 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.82 % Parsed axioms : 135
% 0.15/0.82 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 58
% 0.15/0.82 % Initial clauses : 77
% 0.15/0.82 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Initial clauses in saturation : 77
% 0.15/0.82 % Processed clauses : 15
% 0.15/0.82 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.15/0.82 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.82 % Generated clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.82 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.15/0.82 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Paramodulations : 7
% 0.15/0.82 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.15/0.82 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.15/0.82 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.82 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.82 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.82 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.82 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.82 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.82 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.82 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.82 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.82 % Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.82 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 67
% 0.15/0.82 % ...number of literals in the above : 283
% 0.15/0.82 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.82 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.15/0.82 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.82 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.82 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.82 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.82 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.82 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4368
% 0.15/0.82 % Search garbage collected termcells : 356
% 0.15/0.82
% 0.15/0.82 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.82 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.82 % System time : 0.000 s
% 0.15/0.82 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.82 % Maximum resident set size: 3744 pages
% 0.15/0.82
% 0.15/0.82 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.82 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.82 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.82 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.82 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.82 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------