%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV010-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:47:20 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.28s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 8 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(axiom_8,axiom,
( fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1) != n0
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_8) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206) = n0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_5) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1) != n0
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206) = n0,
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
axiom_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(t_206)),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1) != n0
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(X1)) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206) = n0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : HWV010-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.44 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:48:17 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.28/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.28/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.59 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/0.59 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % new_bool_1 with pid 1202605 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.28/0.59 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.28/0.59 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.28/0.59 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.59 % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1202613 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.28/0.59 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.28/0.59 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.28/0.59 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.59 % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.28/0.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.59 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.28/0.59
% 0.28/0.59 % Proof found!
% 0.28/0.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.28/0.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/0.59 % Parsed axioms : 135
% 0.28/0.59 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 109
% 0.28/0.59 % Initial clauses : 26
% 0.28/0.59 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.28/0.59 % Processed clauses : 11
% 0.28/0.59 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.28/0.59 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.28/0.59 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.28/0.59 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.28/0.59 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Paramodulations : 3
% 0.28/0.59 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % NegExts : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.28/0.59 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.59 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.59 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.59 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.59 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.59 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.59 % Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.28/0.59 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.28/0.59 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.28/0.59 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.28/0.59 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18
% 0.28/0.59 % ...number of literals in the above : 54
% 0.28/0.59 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.28/0.59 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.28/0.59 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.28/0.59 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.28/0.59 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/0.59 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2261
% 0.28/0.59 % Search garbage collected termcells : 519
% 0.28/0.59
% 0.28/0.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.59 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.28/0.59 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.28/0.59 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.28/0.59 % Maximum resident set size: 3744 pages
% 0.28/0.59
% 0.28/0.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.59 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.28/0.59 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.28/0.59 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.28/0.59 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.28/0.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------