%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV011-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:47:20 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 5 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 16 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
( level(t_139) != fifo_length
| ~ p_Full(t_139) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(axiom_23,axiom,
( ~ p_Full(X1)
| int_level(X1) = fifo_length ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_23) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
( level(t_139) = fifo_length
| p_Full(t_139) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_21) ).
cnf(axiom_22,axiom,
( int_level(X1) != fifo_length
| p_Full(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_22) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( level(t_139) != fifo_length
| ~ p_Full(t_139) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ p_Full(X1)
| int_level(X1) = fifo_length ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( level(t_139) = fifo_length
| p_Full(t_139) ),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
axiom_21 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( level(t_139) != fifo_length
| ~ p_Full(t_139) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p_Full(X1)
| int_level(X1) = fifo_length ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p_Full(t_139)
| int_level(t_139) = fifo_length ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p_Full(t_139)
| int_level(t_139) != fifo_length ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
int_level(t_139) = fifo_length,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( int_level(X1) != fifo_length
| p_Full(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Full(t_139),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( int_level(X1) != fifo_length
| p_Full(X1) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HWV011-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:50:13 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 171312 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 171315 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 28
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses : 64
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 64
% 0.11/0.45 % Processed clauses : 14
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.11/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Generated clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.11/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Paramodulations : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 54
% 0.11/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 248
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3311
% 0.11/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 235
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3704 pages
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------