↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : HWV012-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:12:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 1.00s
% Output   : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : HWV012-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 02:20:57 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.38  The process was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.38  Fri Jun 17 02:20:57 2022
% 0.14/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 24801.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.38  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.38  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.38  clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [copy,89,flip.1] {-} n1=n1.
% 0.14/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [copy,99,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.38  99 back subsumes 89.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.76/0.95  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.76/0.95  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.76/0.95  number of clauses in intial UL: 80
% 0.76/0.95  number of clauses initially in problem: 95
% 0.76/0.95  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.76/0.95  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.76/0.95  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.76/0.95  absolute distinct symbol count: 24
% 0.76/0.95     distinct predicate count: 13
% 0.76/0.95     distinct function count: 7
% 0.76/0.95     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  
% 0.76/0.95  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.76/1.00  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/1.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.59 sec ----> 535 [hyper,526,22,98] {-} $F.
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.76/1.00  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/1.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  22 [] {+} -p_Reset(A)| -p_Wr_error(plus(A,n1)).
% 0.76/1.00  27 [] {+} p_Reset(A)| -p_Wr(A)|p_Rd(A)| -gt(fifo_length,int_level(A))| -p_Wr_error(plus(A,n1)).
% 0.76/1.00  44 [] {+} p_Reset(A)| -p_Wr(A)| -p_Rd(A)| -p_Wr_error(plus(A,n1)).
% 0.76/1.00  91,90 [] {-} level(A)=int_level(A).
% 0.76/1.00  95 [] {-} gt(fifo_length,level(t_139)).
% 0.76/1.00  96 [copy,95,demod,91] {-} gt(fifo_length,int_level(t_139)).
% 0.76/1.00  97 [] {-} p_Wr(t_139).
% 0.76/1.00  98 [] {-} p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)).
% 0.76/1.00  490 [hyper,98,27,97,96] {-} p_Reset(t_139)|p_Rd(t_139).
% 0.76/1.00  517 [hyper,490,22,98] {-} p_Rd(t_139).
% 0.76/1.00  526 [hyper,517,44,97,98] {-} p_Reset(t_139).
% 0.76/1.00  535 [hyper,526,22,98] {-} $F.
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/1.00  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  ============ end of search ============
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  Process 24801 finished Fri Jun 17 02:20:57 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------