%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:47:21 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 18 unt; 3 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 33 ( 9 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_5,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_5) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_21) ).
cnf(axiom_71,axiom,
( ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_71) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(x_139),n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
axiom_21 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_71]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(x_139),n0),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
minus(int_level(x_139),n1) != int_level(plus(x_139,n1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(x_139),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
gt(int_level(x_139),n0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:47:36 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % sh5l with pid 3386689 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/0.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3386697 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/0.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 95
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses : 90
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 90
% 0.15/0.45 % Processed clauses : 363
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.15/0.45 % ...subsumed : 189
% 0.15/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 172
% 0.15/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 0.15/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 16
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.15/0.45 % Generated clauses : 1085
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 750
% 0.15/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 22
% 0.15/0.45 % Paramodulations : 1073
% 0.15/0.45 % Factorizations : 4
% 0.15/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 8
% 0.15/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 428
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of those cached : 388
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 147
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 123
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 440
% 0.15/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 1716
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 22
% 0.15/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1429
% 0.15/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 744
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 148
% 0.15/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 131
% 0.15/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 36
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 18106
% 0.15/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 202
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3704 pages
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.019 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------