↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : HWV014-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 10:58:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  11   ~;  14   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   3   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X0] : level(X0) = int_level(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_21) ).

fof(f90,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( p_Reset(X0)
      | p_Wr(X0)
      | ~ p_Rd(X0)
      | ~ gt(int_level(X0),n0)
      | int_level(plus(X0,n1)) = minus(int_level(X0),n1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_71) ).

fof(f113,negated_conjecture,
    gt(level(x_139),n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).

fof(f114,negated_conjecture,
    p_Rd(x_139),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).

fof(f115,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_Wr(x_139),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).

fof(f116,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_Reset(x_139),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).

fof(f117,negated_conjecture,
    level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_5) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    gt(int_level(x_139),n0),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f113,f26]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    int_level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(int_level(x_139),n1),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f117,f26,f26]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ p_Rd(X0)
      | p_Wr(X0)
      | ~ p_Reset(X0)
      | gt(int_level(X0),n0)
      | int_level(plus(X0,n1)) = minus(int_level(X0),n1) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f203,plain,
    ~ gt(int_level(x_139),n0),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f118]) ).

fof(f204,plain,
    p_Reset(x_139),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f116]) ).

fof(f697,plain,
    ( p_Wr(x_139)
    | ~ p_Reset(x_139)
    | gt(int_level(x_139),n0)
    | int_level(plus(x_139,n1)) = minus(int_level(x_139),n1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f183,f114]) ).

fof(f706,plain,
    ( ~ p_Reset(x_139)
    | gt(int_level(x_139),n0)
    | int_level(plus(x_139,n1)) = minus(int_level(x_139),n1) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f697,f115]) ).

fof(f707,plain,
    ( gt(int_level(x_139),n0)
    | int_level(plus(x_139,n1)) = minus(int_level(x_139),n1) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f706,f204]) ).

fof(f708,plain,
    int_level(plus(x_139,n1)) = minus(int_level(x_139),n1),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f707,f203]) ).

fof(f709,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f708,f119]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : HWV014-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.38  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 10:55:41 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.48  % (340255)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.16/0.48  % (340263)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=3032923891:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.16/0.48  % (340260)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=2259928942_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % (340262)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=1737892533:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2386269610:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % (340264)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=4189315727:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % (340266)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=2187747896:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % (340265)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=1842963601:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % TRYING [1]
% 0.16/0.48  % TRYING [2]
% 0.16/0.48  % TRYING [3]
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-340255-340261"...
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)...printing done.
% 0.16/0.48  % (340263) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-340255-340263"...
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)Time elapsed: 0.016 s
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.16/0.48  % (340261)Instructions burned: 20 (million)
% 0.16/0.48  % (340255)Success in time 0.056 s
% 0.16/0.48  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------